Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) Toyota ₱4,284,000 | Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024) Mazda ₱3,780,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V8 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 4461cc | 3283cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 32-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Twin Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 232 PS @ 3200 rpm | 300.9 PS |
| Max Torque | 615 Nm @ 1800-2200 rpm | 603 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 7 |
| Length (mm) | 5095 | 5120 |
| Width (mm) | 1980 | 1994 |
| Height (mm) | 1945 | 1745 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 3120 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2640 | 2140 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 93 | 74 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Artisan Red Premium, Sonic Silver, Jet Black, Deep Crystal Blue Mica, Rhodium White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, KDSS | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, KDSS | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 21 |
| Front Tires | 285/60 R18 | 275/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | 285/60 R18 | 275/45R21 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who prioritises rugged off‑road capability, towing strength and classic SUV presence, the 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 is the clear choice. It costs ₱4,284,000 – about ₱504,000 more than the 2024 Mazda CX‑90 – but offers a 4.5 L V8 diesel with 232 PS and a massive 615 Nm of torque at low revs, paired with a 6‑speed automatic and body‑on‑frame construction that excels on rough terrain and heavy loads. Its 5‑door, 2+3+3 seating layout also provides flexible cargo space for large families or gear. Conversely, the Mazda CX‑90, priced at ₱3,780,000, delivers a modern 3.3 L turbo‑charged inline‑4 gasoline engine with 300.9 PS and 603 Nm, housed in a unibody large crossover that feels more car‑like, offers better fuel efficiency and a sleek interior with seven‑seat flexibility. It is suited for urban and highway driving, families that value comfort and style, and buyers who prefer a newer model with a three‑year warranty. In short, choose the Land Cruiser if you need proven durability, diesel torque and off‑road prowess; choose the CX‑90 if you want a lower price, higher peak power, and a more refined, family‑oriented crossover for city use.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda CX‑90 is cheaper at ₱3,780,000 compared to the Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 at ₱4,284,000.
Which model has more torque?
The Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 provides 615 Nm of torque, slightly higher than the Mazda CX‑90’s 603 Nm.
Is the Land Cruiser better for off‑road use?
Yes; its body‑on‑frame construction, 4WD drivetrain and low‑revving diesel torque make it more suited for off‑road and heavy‑load situations.
Which SUV is more suitable for daily city commuting?
The Mazda CX‑90, with its unibody crossover design, gasoline engine and modern amenities,{ }