Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Nissan Z 3.0 Premium MT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Nissan Z 3.0 Premium MT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) Toyota ₱4,284,000 | Nissan Z 3.0 Premium MT (2024) Nissan ₱3,988,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V8 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 4461cc | 2997cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 32-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Twin Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 232 PS @ 3200 rpm | 383 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 615 Nm @ 1800-2200 rpm | 475 Nm @ 1600 - 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | 6-M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Premium Sports |
| Segment | J | Coupe |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 5095 | 4380 |
| Width (mm) | 1980 | 1845 |
| Height (mm) | 1945 | 1315 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2640 | 1600 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 93 | 62 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Boulder Grey Pearl / Black Roof, Everest White / Black Roof, Seiran Blue / Black Roof, Passion Red / Black Roof, Ikazuchi Yellow / Black Roof, Black Diamond Pear |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, KDSS | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, KDSS | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 285/60 R18 | 255/40/R19 |
| Rear Tires | 285/60 R18 | 275/35/R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather-Suede |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Nissan Z 3.0 Premium MT (2024): which should you buy?
The Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) is the better value for a Filipino buyer prioritizing durability and off-road capability. At ₱4,284,000, it costs ₱306,000 more than the Nissan Z 3.0 Premium MT (₱3,988,000) but delivers 232 PS of power against 383 PS, making the LC200 more economical for demanding terrain. While the LC200 offers 4WD and a 5-seat layout with body-on-frame construction, the Nissan Z focuses on performance with 2-seat RWD dynamics. The LC200’s 100,000km/3-year warranty adds long-term security, whereas the Nissan’s 3-year/100,000km coverage is identical. Choose the LC200 if you need an SUV for rugged use and budget flexibility; opt for the Nissan Z if you demand high horsepower and daily driving in urban settings.