Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Toyota Alphard 2.5 HEV CVT – Precious Metal (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Toyota Alphard 2.5 HEV CVT – Precious Metal (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) Toyota ₱4,284,000 | Toyota Alphard 2.5 HEV CVT – Precious Metal (2024) Toyota ₱4,691,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V8 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 4461cc | 2487cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 32-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Twin Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 232 PS @ 3200 rpm | 250 PS @ 6000 rpm (Combined) |
| Max Torque | 615 Nm @ 1800-2200 rpm | 270 Nm @ 4300 - 4500 rpm (Combined) |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | MPV AUV |
| Segment | J | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5095 | 5010 |
| Width (mm) | 1980 | 1850 |
| Height (mm) | 1945 | 1950 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 3000 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2640 | 2310 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 93 | 60 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Platinum White Pearl |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, KDSS | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, KDSS | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 285/60 R18 | — |
| Rear Tires | 285/60 R18 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Four Zone Auto Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 15 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Toyota Alphard 2.5 HEV CVT – Precious Metal (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for the ultimate blend of power, luxury and off‑road capability, the 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT is the clear choice. It comes with a massive 4461cc twin‑turbo V8 that delivers 232 PS and an impressive 615 Nm of torque, far exceeding the 250 PS/270 Nm output of the 2024 Toyota Alphard’s hybrid powertrain. The Land Cruiser’s 6‑speed automatic, 4WD drivetrain and body‑on‑frame construction make it ideal for rough terrain, heavy towing or long‑distance family trips. Its 5‑door layout seats a full 8 people (2+3+3) and its higher price of ₱4,284,000 reflects the premium off‑road package. In contrast, the Alphard is a front‑wheel‑drive MPV with a 2.5 L inline‑4 hybrid, priced slightly higher at ₱4,691,000 and offering a more fuel‑efficient yet less powerful drive. It seats 7 (2+2+3) and is better suited for daily city commuting, family outings on paved roads or those prioritising hybrid efficiency over raw torque. Thus, if you need a rugged, high‑performance SUV for varied terrain and larger passenger capacity, choose the Land Cruiser. If you prefer a modern hybrid MPV for everyday use and slightly better fuel economy, the Alphard is the better fit.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Land Cruiser costs ₱4,284,000 while the Toyota Alphard is priced at ₱4,691,000, so the Land Cruiser is cheaper by ₱407,000.
Which has more power?
The Land Cruiser’s 4.5 L V8 produces 232 PS and 615 Nm of torque, whereas the Alphard’s hybrid delivers only 250 PS combined and 270 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Alphard’s front‑wheel‑drive hybrid powertrain and unibody construction make it more fuel‑efficient for city driving, while the Land Cruiser’s 4WD and larger engine are better suited to off‑road or heavy‑towing tasks.
Which vehicle seats more people?
The Land Cruiser can seat 8 (2+3+3) across three rows, while the Alphard seats 7 (2+2+3).