Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Volvo XC60 PHEV T8 AWD PHEV (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Volvo XC60 PHEV T8 AWD PHEV (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) Toyota ₱4,284,000 | Volvo XC60 PHEV T8 AWD PHEV (2025) Volvo ₱4,550,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V8 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 4461cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 32-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Twin Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | PHEV |
| Max Power | 232 PS @ 3200 rpm | 455 PS |
| Max Torque | 615 Nm @ 1800-2200 rpm | 523 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | Automatic 8-Speed |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Premium Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5095 | 4709 |
| Width (mm) | 1980 | 1998 |
| Height (mm) | 1945 | 1656 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2865 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2640 | 2109 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 93 | 71 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Grey Metallic |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, KDSS | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, KDSS | Integral Axle with Transverse Composite Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 285/60 R18 | 235/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 285/60 R18 | 235/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 15 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Volvo XC60 PHEV T8 AWD PHEV (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who prioritizes rugged off‑road capability, sheer torque and classic SUV presence, the 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 is the stronger choice. It costs slightly less (₱4,284,000 vs ₱4,550,000), delivers 615 Nm of low‑end torque at 1,800‑2,200 rpm, and features a body‑on‑frame construction with 4WD, making it better suited for rough terrain and heavy loads. Its 2+3+3 seating layout provides flexible passenger arrangements, and the 6‑speed automatic paired with a V8 diesel offers proven durability for long trips across the Philippines. Conversely, the 2025 Volvo XC60 PHEV T8 targets buyers who value modern luxury, fuel‑efficiency and a lower emissions footprint. It offers a higher peak power of 455 PS, an 8‑speed automatic, and an unibody crossover design that delivers a smoother on‑road ride and premium interior feel, but it lacks the Land Cruiser’s extreme torque and off‑road pedigree. Both carry a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, but the Land Cruiser’s larger dimensions (5,095 mm length) give it a more commanding road presence. Choose the Land Cruiser if you need a hard‑working, torque‑rich SUV for provincial travel or towing; opt for the Volvo if you prefer a sleek, high‑tech, eco‑friendly crossover for city commuting and occasional weekend trips.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 is priced at ₱4,284,000, which is ₱266,000 less than the Volvo XC60 PHEV’s ₱4,550,000 price.
Which model has more power?
The Volvo XC60 PHEV T8 produces 455 PS, surpassing the Land Cruiser’s 232 PS, giving the Volvo a higher peak power output.
Which SUV is better for off‑road use?
The Land Cruiser’s body‑on‑frame construction, 4WD drivetrain and 615 Nm of low‑end torque make it more capable for off‑road conditions than the Volvo’s unibody crossover design.
Is the Volvo more suitable for daily commuting?
Yes, the Volvo’s unibody crossover layout, higher peak power, 8‑speed automatic and PHEV powertrain provide a smoother, more fuel‑efficient ride ideal for city driving, whereas the Land Cruiser is geared toward rugged utility.