Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (White Pearl) (2016) Toyota ₱4,299,000 | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | — |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V8 | V6 |
| Displacement | 4461cc | 3496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 32-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Twin Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Twin-turbo, Intercooled |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 232 PS @ 3200 rpm | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 615 Nm @ 1800-2200 rpm | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | 10-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5095 | 5636 |
| Width (mm) | 1980 | 2029 |
| Height (mm) | 1945 | 1938 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 3343 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2640 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 93 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, KDSS | Independent Suspension |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, KDSS | Independent Suspension |
| Front Wheels | 18 | — |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | — |
| Front Tires | 285/60 R18 | — |
| Rear Tires | 285/60 R18 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Type | Power | — |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | — |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | — |
| Parking Brake | Manual | — |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | — |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | — |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018): which should you buy?
The 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 and the 2018 Ford Expedition Limited MAX are both full‑size, body‑on‑frame SUVs with three‑row seating, but they cater to slightly different priorities. The Land Cruiser is priced at ₱4,299,000, about ₱41,000 more than the Expedition’s ₱4,258,000, yet it offers a V8 diesel engine with 232 PS and 615 Nm of torque, delivering strong low‑end pull that suits off‑road and heavy‑load scenarios. Its 6‑speed automatic and 4WD system are proven for rugged terrain, and the diesel fuel type can be more economical for long‑distance cruising in the Philippines where diesel is often cheaper. The Expedition, on the other hand, brings a 3.5 L twin‑turbo V6 gasoline engine that produces 375 PS and 640 Nm, giving it a clear advantage in outright power and higher‑rpm performance, complemented by a modern 10‑speed automatic for smoother highway driving. Its longer wheelbase (5,636 mm vs 5,095 mm) translates to more interior space, which may feel roomier for three‑row occupants. Both share the same warranty and drivetrain layout, but the Expedition’s newer model year and higher torque at a higher rpm range make it better suited for families needing extra power on highways, while the Land Cruiser remains the choice for buyers prioritising diesel efficiency and proven off‑road durability. Choose the Land Cruiser if you value diesel torque, off‑road credibility, and can tolerate a slightly higher price; opt for the Expedition if you prefer more horsepower, a longer cabin, and a newer‑year vehicle at a marginally lower cost.
Frequently asked questions
Which SUV is cheaper?
The Ford Expedition Limited MAX is priced at ₱4,258,000, which is ₱41,000 less than the Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 priced at ₱4,299,000.
Which model has more power?
The Expedition’s 3.5 L twin‑turbo V6 produces 375 PS, surpassing the Land Cruiser’s 232 PS V8 diesel.
Is the Land Cruiser’s diesel engine more suitable for fuel economy?
The Land Cruiser uses a diesel engine, which is generally more fuel‑efficient for long‑distance travel compared to the Expedition’s gasoline engine, though exact consumption figures are not provided.
Which SUV offers more interior space?
The Expedition is longer at 5,636 mm versus the Land Cruiser’s 5,095 mm, suggesting a roomier cabin for three‑row seating.