Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active+ 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active+ 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active+ 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) Toyota ₱1,614,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2494cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 180 PS @ 6000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 233 Nm @ 4100 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Van |
| Segment | J | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4605 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1845 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2660 | 2555 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 60 | 65 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2076 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt |
| Steering Ratio | 5.3 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Sport Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active+ 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the Toyota RAV4 2.5 Active+ and the Nissan NV350 Urvan depends on your primary need. The RAV4 is a gasoline-powered crossover (180 PS, 233 Nm, 6-speed automatic) designed for comfortable daily driving with a 5-seat layout, ideal for families or individuals who prioritize power, ride quality, and convenience. At ₱1,614,000, it offers better acceleration and a smoother automatic transmission. The NV350 Urvan, on the other hand, is a diesel-powered van (129 PS, 356 Nm, 5-speed manual) with a body-on-frame construction, making it more suitable for heavy-duty use, cargo, or transporting many passengers (typical 12–15 seats, though not explicitly stated). Its lower price (₱1,570,000) and high torque (356 Nm at low RPM) are advantageous for hauling loads and fuel efficiency (diesel), but it lacks the RAV4's refinement and automatic gearbox. If you need a versatile family vehicle with good power and comfort, choose the RAV4. If you require a workhorse for commercial or large-group transport, the NV350 is the practical, cheaper option.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is cheaper at ₱1,570,000, while the Toyota RAV4 costs ₱1,614,000 — a difference of ₱44,000.
Which has more power?
The Toyota RAV4 has a higher horsepower rating of 180 PS, but the Nissan NV350 has significantly more torque (356 Nm vs. 233 Nm), making it better for hauling or towing.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota RAV4 is better for daily commuting due to its gasoline engine, automatic transmission, and crossover comfort. The NV350's manual transmission and truck-like ride are less ideal for city driving.
Which one is more practical for a large family or business?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is more practical for large groups or commercial use, as it can seat many passengers (typically up to 15) and has a diesel engine for lower running costs. The RAV4 seats only five.