Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) Toyota ₱1,974,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2494cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 180 PS @ 6000 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 233 Nm @ 4100 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T ECT | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4605 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1845 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1715 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2660 | 2845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 60 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0 | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0 | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Steering Ratio | 5.3 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Sport Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For most Filipino buyers, the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 3.0 AT (2018) is the better choice due to its lower price (₱1,845,000 vs ₱1,974,000) and significantly higher torque (380 Nm vs 233 Nm), which makes it more capable for hauling, towing, and off-road driving. Its turbo diesel engine offers better fuel economy for heavy use, while the larger body (4825 mm length vs 4605 mm) provides more passenger and cargo space. The Toyota RAV4 2.5 Premium (2016) has a slight edge in power (180 PS vs 177 PS) and a smoother, more refined gasoline engine suited for city driving, but its higher price and lower torque limit its versatility. Both have similar warranty coverage (100,000 km/3 years). If you prioritize value and practicality, choose the mu-X. If you want a car-like crossover for urban commuting and don't need diesel torque, the RAV4 is acceptable but costs more.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Toyota RAV4 at ₱1,974,000.
Which has more power?
The Toyota RAV4 has slightly more power (180 PS vs 177 PS), but the Isuzu mu-X has significantly more torque (380 Nm vs 233 Nm).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota RAV4's gasoline engine and FWD provide a smoother, more refined ride for city driving, but its smaller size may be easier to maneuver. The mu-X's diesel torque is good for highway overtaking, but its RWD and larger size may be less agile in traffic.
Which is more spacious?
The Isuzu mu-X is larger, with a length of 4825 mm and width of 1860 mm, while the RAV4 is 4605 mm long. This likely gives the mu-X more interior space.