Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT (2016) Toyota ₱2,134,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2494cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 180 PS @ 6000 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 233 Nm @ 4100 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4605 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1845 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1715 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2660 | 2845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 60 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0 | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0 | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Steering Ratio | 5.3 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers looking for a versatile crossover that balances power, practicality and cost, the 2016 Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT is the better choice. It comes in a lower price of ₱2,134,000 compared to the Isuzu mu‑X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT’s ₱2,145,000, offering a slight savings of ₱11,000. The Rav‑4’s 2.5‑liter inline‑4 engine delivers 180 PS at 6000 rpm and 233 Nm torque at 4100 rpm, while the Isuzu’s larger 3.0‑liter turbocharged diesel produces 177 PS but with a higher torque of 380 Nm, giving it an advantage in low‑speed pulling power. However, the Rav‑4’s 5‑door body and 2+3 seating configuration provide more cabin flexibility for families, whereas the Isuzu’s 4‑door layout and 2+3+2 seating may appeal to those needing an extra rear seat. Both vehicles share a 6‑speed automatic transmission, AWD/4WD drivetrain and a 100 000 km/3‑year warranty. The Rav‑4’s unibody construction and 4605 mm length make it more maneuverable in urban settings, while the Isuzu’s longer 4825 mm frame and wider 1860 mm width give it a more robust presence on rough terrain. Ultimately, if you prioritize lower purchase cost, easier city handling and a slightly higher horsepower figure, the Toyota Rav‑4 is preferable. If you need more torque for heavy loads or a larger rear seat, the Isuzu mu‑X would be better.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Rav‑4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT costs ₱2,134,000, which is ₱11,000 cheaper than the Isuzu mu‑X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT priced at ₱2,145,000.
Which has more power?
The Rav‑4’s 2.5‑liter engine produces 180 PS at 6000 rpm, slightly higher than the Isuzu’s 177 PS at 3550‑3650 rpm, but the Isuzu offers higher torque of 380 Nm versus the Rav‑4’s 233 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Rav‑4’s 5‑door body, 4605 mm length and unibody construction make it more maneuverable in urban traffic, while the Isuzu’s larger 4825 mm length and wider width may be less convenient in tight city streets.
Which vehicle offers more seating flexibility?
The Rav‑4 seats 2+3, providing a single row of two and a second row of three, whereas the Isuzu seats 2+3+2, adding an extra rear seat for a total of seven occupants.