Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT (2016) Toyota ₱2,134,000 Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000
Overview
Model Year 2016 2018
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000 km/3-years
Availability Current Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2494cc 2999cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i Turbo Intercooler
Fuel Type Gas Diesel
Max Power 180 PS @ 6000 rpm 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm
Max Torque 233 Nm @ 4100 rpm 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm
Transmission 6-speed A/T 6-Speed A/T
Drivetrain AWD 4WD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Crossover SUV
Segment J J
Construction Unibody
Doors 5 4
Seating Capacity 2+3 2+3+2
Length (mm) 4605 4825
Width (mm) 1845 1860
Height (mm) 1715 1840
Wheelbase (mm) 2660 2845
Fuel Tank (L) 60 65
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson w/ Coil Spring Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer
Rear Suspension Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer
Front Wheels 17x7.0 18 Alloy
Rear Wheels 17x7.0 18 Alloy
Front Tires 225/65 R17 255/60 R18
Rear Tires 225/65 R17 255/60 R18
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Disc
Steering Type EPS Power Asisted
Steering Column Tilt Tilt & Telescopic
Steering Ratio 5.3
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock Yes No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist Yes Yes
Parking Sensors Yes Yes
Stability Control Yes Yes
Traction Control Yes Yes
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist Yes Yes
Hill Descent Control Yes Yes
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes Yes
Knee Airbag Yes No
Passenger Airbag Yes Yes
Front Curtain Airbags Yes No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer Yes Yes
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Automatic Climate Control Auto Climate Control System
Rear A/C Vents Yes Yes
Seat Material Leather Leather
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Smart Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start Yes Yes
Cruise Control Yes Yes
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No Yes
Auto Headlights Yes No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No Yes
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode Yes No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 6
Touchscreen Yes Yes
Navigation Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No Yes
MP3 Playback Yes Yes
iPod Support Yes Yes
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights LED LED
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights Yes Yes
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT (2016) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?

For Filipino buyers looking for a versatile crossover that balances power, practicality and cost, the 2016 Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT is the better choice. It comes in a lower price of ₱2,134,000 compared to the Isuzu mu‑X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT’s ₱2,145,000, offering a slight savings of ₱11,000. The Rav‑4’s 2.5‑liter inline‑4 engine delivers 180 PS at 6000 rpm and 233 Nm torque at 4100 rpm, while the Isuzu’s larger 3.0‑liter turbocharged diesel produces 177 PS but with a higher torque of 380 Nm, giving it an advantage in low‑speed pulling power. However, the Rav‑4’s 5‑door body and 2+3 seating configuration provide more cabin flexibility for families, whereas the Isuzu’s 4‑door layout and 2+3+2 seating may appeal to those needing an extra rear seat. Both vehicles share a 6‑speed automatic transmission, AWD/4WD drivetrain and a 100 000 km/3‑year warranty. The Rav‑4’s unibody construction and 4605 mm length make it more maneuverable in urban settings, while the Isuzu’s longer 4825 mm frame and wider 1860 mm width give it a more robust presence on rough terrain. Ultimately, if you prioritize lower purchase cost, easier city handling and a slightly higher horsepower figure, the Toyota Rav‑4 is preferable. If you need more torque for heavy loads or a larger rear seat, the Isuzu mu‑X would be better.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper?

The Toyota Rav‑4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT costs ₱2,134,000, which is ₱11,000 cheaper than the Isuzu mu‑X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT priced at ₱2,145,000.

Which has more power?

The Rav‑4’s 2.5‑liter engine produces 180 PS at 6000 rpm, slightly higher than the Isuzu’s 177 PS at 3550‑3650 rpm, but the Isuzu offers higher torque of 380 Nm versus the Rav‑4’s 233 Nm.

Which is better for daily commuting in the city?

The Rav‑4’s 5‑door body, 4605 mm length and unibody construction make it more maneuverable in urban traffic, while the Isuzu’s larger 4825 mm length and wider width may be less convenient in tight city streets.

Which vehicle offers more seating flexibility?

The Rav‑4 seats 2+3, providing a single row of two and a second row of three, whereas the Isuzu seats 2+3+2, adding an extra rear seat for a total of seven occupants.