Volvo XC90 T6 (2016) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Volvo XC90 T6 (2016) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Volvo XC90 T6 (2016) Volvo ₱6,695,000 | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 2 Years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Insurance | Upon Request | — |
| Availability | Current | — |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | V6 |
| Displacement | 1969cc | 3496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-Valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Twin-turbo, Intercooled |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 320 HP @ 5700 rpm | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 400 Nm @ 5400 rpm | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 8-Speed Automatic | 10-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5:1 |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 0 | — |
| Top Speed | 230 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 13 | — |
| Euro NCAP Rating | 5 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Luxury SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4950 | 5636 |
| Width (mm) | 2008 | 2029 |
| Height (mm) | 1776 | 1938 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2984 | 3343 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2750 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 71 | — |
| Front Headroom (mm) | 1051 | — |
| Rear Headroom (mm) | 997 | — |
| Front Legroom (mm) | 1038 | — |
| Rear Legroom (mm) | 940 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut, Coil Spring, Hydraulic Shock Absorbers, Stabilizer Bar | Independent Suspension |
| Rear Suspension | Multilink, Independent Suspensionwith Coil Springs, Hydraulic Shock Absorber, Stabilizer Bar | Independent Suspension |
| Front Wheels | 19 | — |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | Yes | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | Yes | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Keyless Entry | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | 4-Zone | — |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | — |
| Parking Brake | Electric Par | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | — |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Volvo XC90 T6 (2016) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018): which should you buy?
The Volvo XC90 T6 (2016) is the better value for most Filipino buyers, priced at ₱6,695,000 versus ₱4,258,000 for the Ford Expedition (2018). Its 1969cc turbocharged inline-4 delivers 320 HP with AWD, while the 3496cc twin-turbo V6 gives 375 PS but costs significantly more. The XC90’s 13 km/l combined fuel economy and 5-star Euro NCAP rating make it more practical for long drives, though the Expedition offers a higher seating capacity (2+3+3 vs. unspecified). Choose the XC90 if budget is tight and luxury is priority; opt for the Expedition if you prioritize raw power and space for larger families.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Expedition (2018) costs ₱4,258,000, while the Volvo XC90 (2016) is ₱6,695,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Expedition (2018) produces 375 PS, while the Volvo XC90 (2016) delivers 320 HP.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Volvo XC90 (2016) offers 13 km/l combined fuel economy, which is more efficient for daily commutes.
What is the warranty period?
The Volvo XC90 (2016) has a 2-year warranty, while the Ford Expedition (2018) offers 3 years or 100,000 km.