Audi A4 2.0 TDI (2017) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi A4 2.0 TDI (2017) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi A4 2.0 TDI (2017) Audi ₱3,850,000 | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | — |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | V6 |
| Displacement | 1968cc | 3496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 16.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Twin-turbo, Intercooled |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3250-4200 rpm | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 320 Nm @1500-3250 rpm | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 10-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | 8.7 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 219km/h | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Segment | D | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4726 | 5636 |
| Width (mm) | 1842 | 2029 |
| Height (mm) | 1427 | 1938 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2820 | 3343 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1465 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 40 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent, five-link axle with front track rod, aluminum transverse link, subframe and tubular anti-roll bar | Independent Suspension |
| Rear Suspension | Independent, five-link axle with rear track rod, resiliently mounted subframe and anti-roll bar | Independent Suspension |
| Front Wheels | 19 | — |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | — |
| Front Tires | 245/35 R19 | — |
| Rear Tires | 245/35 R19 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Steering Column | Electromechanical | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Three-Zone Auto Climate Control | — |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | — |
| Parking Brake | Electric | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | — |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | — |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Audi A4 2.0 TDI (2017) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2017 Audi A4 2.0 TDI and the 2018 Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Limited MAX, the choice hinges on budget, intended use, and space needs. The Audi A4 costs ₱3,850,000, about ₱408,000 less than the Expedition, and offers a compact D‑segment sedan with a 7‑speed DCT, front‑wheel drive and a modest 150 PS diesel engine. It is suited for city commuting, offers better fuel economy typical of diesel sedans, and fits easier into Manila’s tight parking spaces. The Expedition, priced at ₱4,258,000, is a full‑size J‑segment SUV with a 375 PS twin‑turbo V6, 4WD, 10‑speed automatic, and three‑row seating for up to eight passengers, making it ideal for large families or those needing cargo capacity and off‑road capability. However, its body‑on‑frame construction and larger dimensions (5,636 mm long) mean higher running costs and tougher maneuverability{.} In summary, choose the Audi A4 if you prioritize lower price, easier urban handling, and a premium sedan experience; choose the Ford Expedition if you need maximum power, seating capacity, and SUV versatility despite the higher price and larger footprint.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Audi A4 2.0 TDI is cheaper at ₱3,850,000 compared to the Ford Expedition{.}.
Which model has more power?
The Ford Expedition’s 3.5L EcoBoost V6 produces 375 PS, far exceeding the Audi A4’s 150 PS.
Is the Audi A4 better for daily commuting in the city?
Yes; its compact sedan size, front‑wheel drive, and lower price make it more practical for urban traffic and parking.
Which vehicle offers more passenger capacity?
The Expedition seats up to eight (2+3+3 configuration), while the Audi A4 seats five.