Ford Everest 2.2 Titanium 4×2 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Titanium 4×2 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Titanium 4×2 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,918,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 2.2 Titanium 4×2 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the Ford Everest 2.2 Titanium 4x2 AT (2017) and the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT (2018) hinges on priorities. The Everest is priced at ₱1,918,000, while the mu-X is cheaper at ₱1,845,000. The mu-X offers more power with 177 PS vs. 160 PS, and a larger 3.0L engine compared to the Everest's 2.2L. However, the Everest has higher torque (385 Nm at 1600 rpm vs. 380 Nm at 1800-2800 rpm), providing better low-end grunt. The Everest seats 7 (2+3+2) and is longer (4893 mm), making it more suitable for larger families, while the mu-X seats 5 and is slightly shorter (4825 mm). Both have 6-speed A/T, RWD, and body-on-frame construction. The mu-X is more fuel-efficient due to its larger displacement but similar torque. For daily commuting and tighter budgets, the mu-X is the better value. For those needing extra seating and low-end torque for off-road or towing, the Everest is preferable. Both have 3-year/100,000 km warranties.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT (2018) is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Ford Everest 2.2 Titanium 4x2 AT (2017) at ₱1,918,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Isuzu mu-X has more power with 177 PS, while the Ford Everest has 160 PS. However, the Everest has higher torque (385 Nm) at a lower rpm (1600 rpm) than the mu-X (380 Nm at 1800-2800 rpm).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its lower price and slightly better fuel economy from its larger 3.0L engine. The Ford Everest's higher low-end torque may be beneficial for stop-and-go traffic, but the mu-X offers a more cost-effective package.
Which has more seating capacity?
The Ford Everest seats 7 (2+3+2 configuration), while the Isuzu mu-X seats 5 (2+3). The Everest is also longer (4893 mm vs. 4825 mm), providing more interior space for passengers.