Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs BYD Shark 6 DMO Premium (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs BYD Shark 6 DMO Premium (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 | BYD Shark 6 DMO Premium (2025) BYD ₱2,618,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 6 years or 150,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | 16 Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Hybrid / Electric |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | PHEV |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | Combined Motor Power 435 PS |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm | Combined Motor Torque 640 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Segment | J | Pickup |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 5457 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1971 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1925 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 3260 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Deep Sea Blue, Cosmos Black, Aurora White |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2710 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 60 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Double wishbone w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 265/65R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 265/65R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs BYD Shark 6 DMO Premium (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality, power and cost, the Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT stands out as the more versatile and affordable option. Priced at ₱2,288,000 versus the BYD Shark 6 DMO Premium’s ₱2,618,000, the Everest offers a substantial price advantage of ₱330,000. It also delivers higher torque at 470 Nm compared to the Shark’s 640 Nm, which is more than adequate for heavy-duty hauling and off‑road use. The Everest’s 4WD drivetrain, body‑on‑frame construction, and larger seating capacity (2+3+2) make it better suited for families or commercial use that requires a robust SUV. The BYD Shark, while newer and featuring a hybrid/electric powertrain with 435 PS combined motor power, is limited to a pickup body style and seats only 2+3. Its AWD system and PHEV technology may appeal to buyers prioritizing eco‑friendly driving, but it comes at a higher price and with fewer seats. Overall, if you need a cost‑effective, spacious, and powerful 4WD SUV for family or work purposes, the Ford Everest is the recommended choice. If you prefer a modern hybrid pickup and can justify the extra cost, the BYD Shark is an option.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Everest costs ₱2,288,000 while the BYD Shark 6 DMO Premium is priced at ₱2,618,000, making the Everest cheaper by ₱330,000.
Which has more power?
The BYD Shark’s combined motor power is 435 PS, whereas the Ford Everest delivers 200 PS; thus the Shark has higher power output.
Which is better for family use?
The Everest seats 2+3+2, offering more passenger space than the Shark’s 2+3 seating layout, making it better for families.
Which has a longer warranty?
The BYD Shark offers 6 years or 150,000 km, while the Everest provides a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty.