Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs GWM Tank 300 2.0L Turbo 4×4 AT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs GWM Tank 300 2.0L Turbo 4×4 AT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 | GWM Tank 300 2.0L Turbo 4×4 AT (2024) GWM ₱2,678,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 1967cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 217 PS @ 5500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4760 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1930 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1903 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2750 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Orange, White, Grey, Red, Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2155 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 75 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 17" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 17" alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 265/65/R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 265/65/R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Nappa leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs GWM Tank 300 2.0L Turbo 4×4 AT (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power and passenger flexibility, the 2017 Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT edges out the 2024 GWM Tank 300 in overall value. The Everest is priced about ₱390,000 less (₱2.288 million vs ₱2.678 million) while still delivering more torque (470 Nm vs 380 Nm) and a higher low‑end power band, which translates to stronger pulling power for mountain roads and heavy loads. Its 2+3+2 seating layout offers seven seats, giving extra room for larger families or group trips, whereas the Tank 300 seats only five (2+3). Both vehicles share a body‑on‑frame construction and 4WD drivetrain, but the Everest’s 6‑speed automatic is proven and simpler compared to the Tank’s newer 8‑speed unit. The Tank 300 does have a slightly higher peak power (217 PS vs 200 PS) and a modern 2024 model year, but these gains are offset by its higher price and lower torque, which matters more for off‑road and towing tasks common in the Philippines. Therefore, buyers who prioritize lower purchase price, higher torque, and seven‑seat practicality should opt for the Ford Everest, while those who value the newest model year and a marginal power bump may consider the GWM Tank if budget is less of a concern.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The 2017 Ford Everest costs ₱2,288,000, which is about ₱390,000 less than the 2024 GWM Tank 300 priced at ₱2,678,000.
Which model has more torque?
The Ford Everest produces 470 Nm of torque at 1,750 rpm, whereas the GWM Tank 300 delivers 380 Nm between 1,800‑3,600 rpm.
How do the seating capacities differ?
The Everest offers a 2+3+2 layout for seven passengers, while the Tank 300 provides a 2+3 arrangement for five passengers.
Is the newer model year worth the extra cost?
The Tank 300 is a 2024 model with a slightly higher peak power (217 PS vs 200 PS), but it costs more and has lower torque; buyers must decide if the newer styling and marginal power gain justify the higher price.