Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Honda CR-V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Honda CR-V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 | Honda CR-V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026) Honda ₱2,358,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 190 PS |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 240 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4691 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1866 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1681 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2700 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Platinum White Pearl, Canyon River Blue Metallic, Meteoroid Grey Metallic, Crystal Black Pearl |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1671 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 57 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 235/60R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 235/60R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 7 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Honda CR-V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers weighing the Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) and the Honda CR‑V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026), the decision hinges on purpose and budget. The Everest, priced at ₱2,288,000, offers a robust 200 PS diesel engine with 470 Nm torque, body‑on‑frame construction, and a 4WD drivetrain—ideal for off‑road adventures or families needing extra cargo space. Its 5‑door SUV layout and 2+3+2 seating accommodate up to seven passengers, making it a practical choice for larger households or frequent road trips. Conversely, the CR‑V commands a slightly higher price of ₱2,358,000 but delivers a 190 PS gasoline engine with 240 Nm torque in a lighter unibody crossover, coupled with an efficient CVT transmission and FWD setup. This makes it more suited for urban commuting, offering better fuel economy and easier maneuverability in city traffic. While both vehicles share a 5‑door configuration and similar seating capacity, the Everest’s diesel power and rugged build give it an edge in off‑road capability, whereas the CR‑V’s gasoline engine and modern CVT provide a smoother daily driving experience. Ultimately, choose the Everest if you prioritize power, durability, and off‑road readiness; opt for the CR‑V if you value a contemporary crossover with efficient performance in everyday city use.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Everest costs ₱2,288,000 while the Honda CR‑V is priced at ₱2,358,000, making the Everest cheaper by ₱70,000.
Which has more power?
The Everest’s 200 PS diesel engine outperforms the CR‑V’s 190 PS gasoline power, giving it a higher peak output.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The CR‑V’s gasoline engine, CVT transmission, and FWD drivetrain offer smoother city driving and potentially better fuel economy for daily commutes.
Which vehicle offers more off‑road capability?
The Everest’s 4WD drivetrain, body‑on‑frame construction, and higher torque make it more suitable for off‑road or rugged terrain.