Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Honda CR-V 2.0 RS e:HEV AWD E-CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Honda CR-V 2.0 RS e:HEV AWD E-CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 | Honda CR-V 2.0 RS e:HEV AWD E-CVT (2026) Honda ₱2,838,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Hybrid |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 1993cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 148 PS |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 183 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | E-CVT |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4691 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1866 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1691 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2700 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Platinum White Pearl, Canyon River Blue Metallic, Meteoroid Grey Metallic, Crystal Black Pearl |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1780 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 57 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 235/60R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 235/60R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Honda CR-V 2.0 RS e:HEV AWD E-CVT (2026): which should you buy?
The 2017 Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT is the better choice for Filipino buyers prioritizing affordability and torque. At ₱2,288,000, it is significantly cheaper than the ₱2,838,000 Honda CR-V 2.0 RS e:HEV AWD E-CVT. Its 470 Nm of torque at 1750 rpm and 200 PS of power offer superior capability for challenging terrain, while the 6-speed automatic transmission provides smooth operation. The Everest’s 5-door, 2+3+2 seating layout supports family needs, whereas the CR-V’s 2+3 configuration is limited by capacity. The Everest’s 100,000km/3-year warranty adds confidence for long-term use. For daily commuting, the CR-V’s hybrid efficiency is a plus, but the Everest’s diesel engine delivers stronger performance for off-road work. Choose the Everest if budget and torque are top priorities; opt for the CR-V if hybrid benefits and fewer seats matter more.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The 2017 Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT costs ₱2,288,000, while the 2026 Honda CR-V 2.0 RS e:HEV AWD E-CVT costs ₱2,838,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Everest delivers 200 PS of power versus the CR-V’s 148 PS, with 470 Nm of torque compared to 183 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The CR-V’s 1993cc hybrid engine suggests better fuel efficiency for daily use, though the Everest’s 3198cc diesel engine offers stronger performance.
What is the warranty coverage?
Both vehicles have 3-year/100,000 km warranties.