Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 | Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT (2026) Honda ₱2,488,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 1993cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 148 PS |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 183 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | E-CVT |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4691 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1866 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1681 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2700 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Platinum White Pearl, Canyon River Blue Metallic, Meteoroid Grey Metallic, Crystal Black Pearl |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1750 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 57 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 235/60R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 235/60R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT (2026): which should you buy?
The 2017 Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (₱2,288,000) is the better long-term value for Filipino buyers prioritizing capability. Its 200 PS diesel engine and 4WD system offer superior off-road and traction performance compared to the 148 PS hybrid CR-V’s front-wheel drive, justifying the ₱200,000 premium. The Everest’s 100,000km/3-year warranty provides clearer long-term coverage than the CR-V’s 3-year/100,000 km plan. For daily commuting, the CR-V’s e-CVT and hybrid efficiency may offer lower fuel costs, but the Everest’s mechanical robustness and available 4WD make it the smarter pick for demanding environments. Buyers seeking pure utility in the Philippines should lean toward the Everest’s proven reliability and drivetrain advantage.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The 2017 Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT costs ₱2,288,000, while the 2026 Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT costs ₱2,488,000.
Which has more power?
The 2017 Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT delivers 200 PS, while the 2026 Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT delivers 148 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The 2026 Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT uses a hybrid system with an e-CVT, potentially offering lower fuel costs for daily use.
Which is more reliable long-term?
The 2017 Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT offers a 100,000km/3-year warranty, which is clearer than the CR-V’s 3-year/100,000 km plan.