Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4×4 AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4×4 AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 | Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4×4 AT (2025) Isuzu ₱2,670,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 190 PS @ 3600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 450 Nm @ 2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4850 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1870 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1825 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2825 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Eiger Grey, Satin Pearl White, Mercury Silver, Splash White, Onyx Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2700 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Multi-link with coil spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 20 |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 265/50R20 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 265/50R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4×4 AT (2025): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4x4 AT (2017) and the Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4x4 AT (2025) hinges on budget, power, and modernity. The Everest is significantly cheaper at ₱2,288,000 versus the mu-X at ₱2,670,000, offering a 382,000 peso savings. It also delivers more power (200 PS vs 190 PS) and torque (470 Nm vs 450 Nm), with a larger 3.2L inline-5 engine. However, the Everest is a 2017 model, so it lacks the latest technology and design updates. The mu-X is a 2025 model, meaning it benefits from newer features, a more modern interior, and potentially better fuel efficiency from its 3.0L inline-4 engine. Both are body-on-frame SUVs with 4WD and 7 seats, suitable for off-road and family use. For buyers prioritizing value and outright power, the Everest is the better deal. For those who want a newer vehicle with the latest amenities and are willing to pay more, the mu-X is the smarter choice. Daily commuting favors the mu-X due to its newer platform and likely better refinement.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4x4 AT (2017) is cheaper at ₱2,288,000 compared to the Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4x4 AT (2025) at ₱2,670,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Everest produces 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque, while the Isuzu mu-X produces 190 PS and 450 Nm. The Everest is more powerful.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X (2025) is likely better for daily commuting due to its newer model year, which typically brings improved ride comfort, technology, and fuel efficiency, though the data does not specify fuel economy.
Which has a longer warranty?
Both offer the same warranty: 3 years or 100,000 km, whichever comes first.