Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 | Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2023) Mazda ₱2,890,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 3283cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 284 PS @ 5000 - 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 450 Nm @ 2000 - 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 12:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4745 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1890 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1680 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2870 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Rhodium White Premium, Soul Red Crystal |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1897 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 58 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 20" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 20" alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 235/50/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 235/50/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing price, power, and practicality, the 2017 Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT offers a lower upfront cost at ₱2,288,000, a robust diesel engine with 200 PS and a massive 470 Nm of torque that peaks low at 1,750 rpm, and a body‑on‑frame construction that promises durability on rough provincial roads. Its three‑row 2+3+2 seating makes it suitable for larger families or groups needing extra cargo space, and the 4WD system adds confidence on unpaved terrain. However, the newer 2023 Mazda CX‑60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo, priced at ₱2,890,000, brings a more refined unibody midsize crossover feel, higher peak power of 284 PS, and a slightly lower torque spread (450 Nm) with a broader rpm band, plus an 8‑speed automatic for smoother city driving. The CX‑60’s hybrid‑ready platform and modern AWD system cater to urban commuters who value fuel efficiency, ride comfort, and contemporary styling, though it lacks the third‑row seat and the rugged frame of the Everest. Choose the Everest if you need a cheaper, torque‑rich, three‑row SUV for off‑road or family trips. Opt for the CX‑60 if you prefer a newer, more powerful, fuel‑efficient crossover for daily city use and don’t need extra seating.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The 2017 Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium costs ₱2,288,000, which is ₱602,000 less than the 2023 Mazda CX‑60 priced at ₱2,890,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Mazda CX‑60 produces 284 PS, surpassing the Ford Everest’s 200 PS, giving the CX‑60 a clear power advantage.
Is there a difference in seating capacity?
Yes, the Ford Everest offers three rows with a 2+3+2 layout, while the Mazda CX‑60 is a five‑door crossover with only two rows and no third‑row seating.
Which SUV is better suited for rough roads?
The Ford Everest’s body‑on‑frame construction, 4WD drivetrain, and high low‑end torque make it more suitable for rough or unpaved roads compared to the unibody, AWD Mazda CX‑60.