Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mazda CX-8 2.5L 2WD Signature 7-Seater (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mazda CX-8 2.5L 2WD Signature 7-Seater (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 | Mazda CX-8 2.5L 2WD Signature 7-Seater (2020) Mazda ₱2,390,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 190 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 252 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4900 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1840 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1730 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2930 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Polymetal Gray, Soul Red Crystal, Snowflake White Pearl, Platinum Quartz, Machine Gray, Jet Black, Deep Crystal Blue |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1761 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 72 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 19" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 19" alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 225/55/R19 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 225/55/R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mazda CX-8 2.5L 2WD Signature 7-Seater (2020): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers choosing between the Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) and the Mazda CX-8 2.5L 2WD Signature 7-Seater (2020), the decision hinges on intended use. The Everest, priced at ₱2,288,000, is a body-on-frame SUV with a turbo-diesel inline-5 engine producing 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque, paired with a 6-speed automatic and 4WD. It is built for off-road capability, towing, and rugged terrain, making it ideal for provincial roads or adventurous families. However, its 2017 model year means older technology and a stiffer ride. The CX-8, at ₱2,390,000, is a unibody crossover with a naturally aspirated gasoline inline-4 producing 190 PS and 252 Nm, driving the front wheels. It offers a smoother, more refined on-road experience, better for daily commuting and city driving, plus a newer model year (2020) and more modern design. The CX-8 is ₱102,000 more expensive but provides greater comfort, while the Everest offers superior off-road prowess and torque. Neither has data on safety or infotainment, so buyers should prioritize: choose the Everest if you need 4WD and towing; choose the CX-8 for everyday urban use, ride comfort, and newer features.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) is cheaper at ₱2,288,000 compared to the Mazda CX-8 2.5L 2WD Signature (2020) at ₱2,390,000.
Which one has more power and torque?
The Ford Everest produces 200 PS and significantly more torque at 470 Nm, while the Mazda CX-8 outputs 190 PS and 252 Nm. The Everest is more powerful, especially for towing or off-road.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda CX-8 is better for daily commuting due to its unibody construction, front-wheel drive, and gasoline engine, offering a smoother and more fuel-efficient ride in urban settings. The Everest's body-on-frame design is less refined on pavement.
Which vehicle has more advanced features?
The provided data does not include specific feature lists for either vehicle. However, the CX-8 is a 2020 model, suggesting it may have newer technology compared to the 2017 Everest, but this is not confirmed from the data alone.