Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT Black Leather (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT Black Leather (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 | Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT Black Leather (2024) Mazda ₱2,580,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 184 PS |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 205 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Sports Coupe |
| Segment | J | Roadster |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 3915 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1735 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1235 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2310 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Jet Black, Soul Red, Snowflake White Pearl, Machine Grey, Eternal Blue |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1138 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 215/45R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 215/45R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT Black Leather (2024): which should you buy?
The Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) is the better value for most Filipino buyers, priced at ₱2,288,000 versus ₱2,580,000 for the Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT (2024). Its 4WD capability and 5-door, 2+3+2 layout offer superior practicality for family use, while the Mazda’s turbocharged 1998cc engine delivers 184 PS and 205 Nm — significantly less power than the Everest’s 200 PS and 470 Nm. The Everest’s 6-speed A/T transmission and body-on-frame construction support rugged driving, whereas the MX-5’s unibody chassis and RWD design prioritize agility. Buyers prioritizing daily commuting, off-road versatility, and space should lean toward the Everest; those seeking sporty handling and lower operating costs may prefer the MX-5, though it lacks the Everest’s 4WD and seating capacity.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) costs ₱2,288,000, while the Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT (2024) is ₱2,580,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) produces 200 PS and 470 Nm, compared to 184 PS and 205 Nm for the Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT (2024).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) offers 4WD and a 5-door layout, making it more practical for daily commuting than the Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT (2024), which has RWD and a 2-door sports coupe design.
What is the warranty duration?
The Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) has a 100,000km/3-years warranty, while the Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT (2024) has 5 years or 100,000 kms.