Ford Everest Titanium 2.2 4×2 AT Premium (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest Titanium 2.2 4×2 AT Premium (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest Titanium 2.2 4×2 AT Premium (2017) Ford ₱2,058,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wishbone with coil over shock and Roll bar | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle, 4bar link, coil spring, Anti-roll bar and watts link | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 20 Alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 20 Alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Electronic Automatic Temperature Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest Titanium 2.2 4×2 AT Premium (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT (2018) at ₱1,845,000 offers better value than the Ford Everest Titanium 2.2 4x2 AT Premium (2017) at ₱2,058,000. The mu-X is ₱213,000 cheaper yet delivers more power (177 PS vs 160 PS) and similar torque (380 Nm vs 385 Nm). Its 3.0L turbo diesel provides stronger low-end grunt, ideal for overtaking and hauling. The Everest has a slight torque advantage (385 Nm) and a 7-seat configuration (2+3+2) versus the mu-X's 5-seat layout (2+3). However, the mu-X's 4-door body may be more practical for daily use, while the Everest's 5-door design offers easier access to the third row. Both have 6-speed A/T and RWD. The mu-X is newer (2018 vs 2017) and more affordable, making it the better choice for budget-conscious buyers seeking power and reliability. The Everest is for those who need seven seats and prefer Ford's brand and features. Overall, the Isuzu mu-X wins on price and power, while the Ford Everest suits larger families.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Ford Everest or Isuzu mu-X?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT (2018) is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Ford Everest Titanium 2.2 4x2 AT Premium (2017) at ₱2,058,000, a difference of ₱213,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The Isuzu mu-X produces 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, while the Ford Everest makes 160 PS and 385 Nm. The mu-X has more power, but the Everest has slightly higher torque.
Which is better for a large family?
The Ford Everest seats 7 (2+3+2) and has 5 doors, making it better for large families needing third-row seating. The Isuzu mu-X seats only 5 (2+3) and has 4 doors.
Which is more fuel-efficient?
Fuel efficiency data is not provided. However, the Ford Everest has a smaller 2.2L engine (2198cc) compared to the Isuzu mu-X's 3.0L (2999cc), so the Everest may be more fuel-efficient, but this is not confirmed by the data.