Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Isuzu D-Max LS LS 4×2 X-Series AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Isuzu D-Max LS LS 4×2 X-Series AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | Isuzu D-Max LS LS 4×2 X-Series AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,420,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged Intercooled, VGS |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800 - 2200 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 5-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pickup |
| Segment | Pick-Up | P |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5295 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1795 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3095 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 76 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | — |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | — |
| Front Wheels | 18 | — |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | — |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | — |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Isuzu D-Max LS LS 4×2 X-Series AT (2018): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) is the better value for most Filipino buyers. At ₱1,328,000, it is ₱92,000 cheaper than the Isuzu D-Max LS LS 4×2 X-Series AT (2018) at ₱1,420,000. The Ranger offers more torque (385 Nm vs 380 Nm) and identical seating (2+3) for the same number of doors (4). While the Isuzu has a higher power output (177 PS vs 160 PS), the Ranger’s lower price makes it the more practical daily commuter choice, especially with the same warranty coverage of 100,000km/3 years. For heavier loads or off-road use, the Isuzu’s larger displacement (2999cc vs 2198cc) and 5-speed automatic transmission could be advantageous, but the Ranger’s budget-friendly nature wins for general use.