Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mazda 2 1.5L Hatchback Sport (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mazda 2 1.5L Hatchback Sport (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | Mazda 2 1.5L Hatchback Sport (2024) Mazda ₱1,250,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 108 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Hatchback |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Hatchback |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4090 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1515 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2570 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 44 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Soul Red Crystal, Snowflake White Pearl, Jet Black, Aero Gray Polymetal Gray, Machine Gray, Eternal Blue |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1040 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 185/60R16 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 185/60R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mazda 2 1.5L Hatchback Sport (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who needs a work‑horse that can haul cargo, tow a trailer or tackle rough provincial roads, the 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT is the clear choice. It costs ₱78,000 more than the Mazda 2, but it delivers 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque – roughly 50 % more power and more than double the torque of the 108 PS, 141 Nm Mazda 2. The Ranger’s 6‑speed manual, rear‑wheel drive layout and robust body‑on‑frame pickup platform give it far greater payload capacity and off‑road capability, while its 2+3 seating still allows a small family or crew. In contrast, the 2024 Mazda 2 hatchback is cheaper, lighter and easier to park in city traffic, with an automatic transmission and front‑wheel drive that favour fuel‑efficient daily commuting. However, it offers only 108 PS, a modest 141 Nm, and no cargo bed, making it unsuitable for heavy‑duty tasks. Choose the Ranger if you need utility, power and durability for work or weekend adventures; opt for the Mazda 2 if your primary concern is urban comfort, lower price and automatic convenience.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda 2 hatchback is cheaper at ₱1,250,000, compared to the Ford Ranger Wildtrak at ₱1,328,000.
Which model has more power?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak produces 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, whereas the Mazda 2 offers 108 PS and 141 Nm.
Is the Ranger suitable for city driving?
The Ranger is a larger, rear‑wheel‑drive pickup with a manual transmission, which may be less convenient in tight city traffic compared to the front‑wheel‑drive, automatic Mazda 2.
What are the seating capacities?
Both vehicles seat 2+3 passengers, but the Ranger provides a cargo bed for additional load, while the Mazda 2 is a five‑door hatchback with no separate bed.