Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GLX Turbo CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GLX Turbo CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | Mitsubishi Destinator GLX Turbo CVT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,389,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 163 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 250 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4680 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1840 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1780 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2815 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Quartz White Pearl (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Lunar Blue Mica (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Blade Silver Metallic, Red Metallic, Jet Black Mica, Graphite Grey Metallic |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1500 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 225/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 225/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GLX Turbo CVT (2026): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) is the better value for most Filipino buyers. At ₱1,328,000, it is ₱61,000 cheaper than the Mitsubishi Destinator GLX Turbo CVT (₱1,389,000). Its 160 PS diesel engine offers more torque (385 Nm) and power delivery for a 4x2 pick-up, while the Ranger’s 6-speed manual transmission and rear-wheel-drive layout suit off-road use. The Destinator, priced higher, targets a different market with a 2026 model, 250 Nm torque, and a 5-door MPV design with 2+3+2 seating, making it less practical for the typical 4x2 work or utility role. Choose the Ranger for budget-conscious buyers needing a rugged 4x2 vehicle, or the Destinator if you value newer tech and extra interior space for a family.