Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Triton GL 4WD MT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Triton GL 4WD MT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | Mitsubishi Triton GL 4WD MT (2024) Mitsubishi ₱1,292,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2439cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 183 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 430 Nm @ 2250 - 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 6-M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pickup |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pickup |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5265 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1865 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1775 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3130 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 75 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Yamabuki Orange, Solid White, Diamond White, Blade Silver, Graphite Grey, Solid Red, Jet Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1815 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 16" steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 16" steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 205/R16C |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 205/R16C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Triton GL 4WD MT (2024): which should you buy?
The Mitsubishi Triton GL offers better value and performance for most Filipino buyers. At ₱1,292,000 vs. ₱1,328,000, the Triton is ₱36,000 cheaper, which is critical for budget-conscious owners. Its 183 PS (22.5 PS more) and 430 Nm (45 Nm more) of torque support heavier loads and tougher terrain, while the 4WD system provides superior traction. The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2017 is only marginally cheaper and benefits from a longer 100,000km/3-year warranty, but the Triton’s modern capabilities and lower price make it the smarter daily driver and workhorse choice. Consider the Triton if you prioritize budget and off-road capability; the Ranger is better if you value reliability and a longer warranty for daily commuting.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Triton GL costs ₱1,292,000, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2017 is ₱1,328,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Mitsubishi Triton GL produces 183 PS vs. 160 PS for the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2017.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2017 has a longer warranty (100,000km/3-years vs. 3-years/100,000km).
What drivetrain does each have?
The Mitsubishi Triton GL has 4WD, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2017 has RWD.