Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,488,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Van |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Construction | — | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2076 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×4 AT and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T depends on your primary need: personal or family transport versus passenger or cargo hauling. The Ranger is a pickup truck with 4WD, making it ideal for off-road adventures, construction sites, or rural driving. It has a more powerful engine (160 PS, 385 Nm) and a 6-speed automatic transmission, offering better acceleration and ease of driving. It seats 5 people and has a lower price at ₱1,488,000. The NV350 Urvan is a van with a 3-year warranty, seating capacity not specified but typically 12-15 passengers, making it perfect for shuttle services, family outings, or business use. It has a less powerful engine (129 PS, 356 Nm) and a 5-speed manual transmission, which may be less convenient in traffic. Its price is higher at ₱1,570,000. If you need a rugged, powerful vehicle for work or play, get the Ranger. If you need to transport many people or large cargo, choose the Urvan.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak or the Nissan NV350 Urvan?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is cheaper at ₱1,488,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan at ₱1,570,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak has more power with 160 PS and 385 Nm torque, versus the Nissan NV350 Urvan's 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak with its automatic transmission is easier to drive in traffic, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan's manual transmission may be less convenient. However, the Urvan can carry more passengers, which may be better for group commutes.
Which vehicle is better for carrying cargo or multiple passengers?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan, being a van, is designed for carrying many passengers or large cargo, whereas the Ford Ranger Wildtrak is a pickup with a bed for cargo but seats only 5.