Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,568,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Van |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Construction | — | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2076 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT and Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T are priced nearly identically (₱1,568,000 vs ₱1,570,000), but serve completely different purposes. The Ranger is a powerful pickup truck with 200 PS and 470 Nm torque, 4WD, and a 6-speed manual, ideal for off-road work or towing. The NV350 is a 3-door van with 129 PS and 356 Nm, RWD, and a 5-speed manual, designed for passenger or cargo transport. For a buyer needing a rugged workhorse or adventure vehicle, the Ranger is the clear choice. For a buyer needing to move people or goods in a van configuration, the NV350 is better. The Ranger offers significantly more power and off-road capability, while the NV350 provides enclosed space and potentially higher seating capacity (though exact seats not specified). Neither is suitable for daily commuting if fuel economy or maneuverability is a priority—both are large diesel vehicles. Choose based on your primary need: power and off-road vs. enclosed transport.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is ₱1,568,000, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan is ₱1,570,000—essentially the same price, with a difference of only ₱2,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger has 200 PS and 470 Nm torque, far exceeding the Nissan NV350's 129 PS and 356 Nm. The Ranger also has a 6-speed manual vs the NV350's 5-speed.
Which is better for daily commuting?
Neither is ideal for daily commuting due to their large size and diesel engines. The Ranger is a pickup with 4WD and high torque, while the NV350 is a van; both are more suited for work or transport than city driving.
Which has more seating capacity?
The Ford Ranger seats 5 (2+3). The Nissan NV350's seating capacity is not specified in the data, but as a van, it likely seats more than 5, possibly up to 12 or more depending on configuration.