Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,188,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pick Up |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pick-Up |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3220 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 80 |
| Construction | — | Body On Frame |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017) at ₱1,188,000 is the better choice over the MT variant at ₱1,219,000. Both share the same 2.2L turbo diesel engine (160 PS, 385 Nm) and RWD drivetrain, but the AT is ₱31,000 cheaper and has an automatic transmission, which is more convenient for daily commuting and traffic. The MT is discontinued and priced higher, making it less practical. The AT also offers the same seating, body type, and warranty. For most buyers, the AT provides better value and usability. However, if you prefer manual control and don't mind paying more for a discontinued model, the MT is an option. Overall, the AT is recommended for its lower price and automatic convenience.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the AT or MT variant?
The AT variant is cheaper at ₱1,188,000, while the MT is ₱1,219,000, a difference of ₱31,000.
Are the engine and power the same for both?
Yes, both have the same 2.2L turbo diesel engine producing 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque.
Which is better for daily commuting in traffic?
The AT variant is better for traffic due to its automatic transmission, while the MT requires manual shifting.
Is the MT variant still available for purchase?
No, the MT variant is discontinued, while the AT is currently available.