Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Chevrolet Tracker 1.0 Turbo LS A/T (2021)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Chevrolet Tracker 1.0 Turbo LS A/T (2021) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Chevrolet Tracker 1.0 Turbo LS A/T (2021) Chevrolet ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2021 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 116 PS @ 5800 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 175 Nm @ 4200 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 6-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Crossover |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4270 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1791 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1627 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2570 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 40 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Satin Steel Gray Metallic, Agate Red Metallic, Black Meet Kettle Metallic, Summit White, Pow Zinga Metallic |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1230 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 215/55/R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 215/55/R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Chevrolet Tracker 1.0 Turbo LS A/T (2021): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing these two vehicles, the choice hinges on purpose and power needs. The 2017 Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L is a diesel-powered, body‑on‑frame pickup that delivers 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, making it well suited for heavy-duty tasks such as towing or off‑road work. Its rear‑wheel drive and 6‑speed manual transmission cater to drivers who prioritize raw capability over convenience. However, it is discontinued and offers only a 2‑plus‑3 seating layout, limiting passenger flexibility.
In contrast, the 2021 Chevrolet Tracker 1.0 Turbo LS A/T is a modern small crossover with a gasoline inline‑3 engine producing 116 PS and 175 Nm. It features front‑wheel drive, a 6‑speed automatic transmission, and five doors with a 2‑plus‑3 seating arrangement, providing greater daily usability for families or city commuting. While its power is lower than the Ranger’s, it offers a more comfortable, unibody construction and a broader color selection.
Both vehicles share the same sticker price of ₱1,219,000 and a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty. If you need a robust workhorse for rugged use and can accept manual shifting, the Ranger is preferable. If you prioritize everyday practicality, automatic convenience, and a family‑friendly layout, the Tracker is the better fit.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
Both vehicles are priced at ₱1,219,000, so they cost the same.
Which has more power?
The Ford Ranger offers 160 PS and 385 Nm, while the Chevrolet Tracker provides 116 PS and 175 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Chevrolet Tracker, with its automatic transmission, front‑wheel drive, and five‑door layout, is more suited for daily commuting.
Which has a longer warranty?
Both vehicles come with a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty.