Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 EL AT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 EL AT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 EL AT (2024) Foton ₱1,150,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 150,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 161 PS @ 3600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 450 Nm @ 2400 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pickup |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pickup |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5617 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 2090 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1910 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3355 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 76 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2605 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 265/70R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 265/70R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 EL AT (2024): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2017 is the better choice for most Filipino buyers prioritizing value and proven reliability. At ₱1,219,000, it is ₱69,000 more expensive than the Foton Thunder 2024, but it offers a 100,000km/3-year warranty compared to the Foton’s 5-year or 150,000km coverage. The Ranger’s 160 PS is slightly below the Thunder’s 161 PS, but both deliver similar torque. The Ranger is a discontinued model with a body-on-frame construction, while the Foton is current with an automatic transmission and 5 seats. The Ranger’s 2+3 seating is adequate for light work, while the Foton’s 5-seat layout suits families. Given the higher warranty and proven brand reputation, the Ranger is ideal for business use or rugged daily commutes, while the Foton may appeal to budget-conscious buyers needing flexibility.