Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs GAC GS3 Emzoom R-Style (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs GAC GS3 Emzoom R-Style (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | GAC GS3 Emzoom R-Style (2023) GAC ₱1,139,900 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1497cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 177 PS @ 5500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 270 Nm @ 1400 - 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 7-DCT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Crossover |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4446 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1850 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1600 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2650 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 47 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Lake Blue, Graphite Grey, Ivory White, Moonlight Grey, Superstar Silver |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1370 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 19 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 235/45/R19 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 235/45/R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs GAC GS3 Emzoom R-Style (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, performance, and daily usability, the GAC GS3 Emzoom R‑Style emerges as the more balanced choice. Priced at ₱1,139,900 versus ₱1,219,000 for the Ford Ranger XLT, it offers a 79,100 ₱ savings. The GS3’s turbocharged 1.5‑L gasoline engine delivers 177 PS at 5,500 rpm and 270 Nm of torque from 1,400 to 4,500 rpm—higher power and a broader torque band than the Ranger’s 160 PS/385 Nm. Its 7‑speed DCT provides smoother shifts compared to the Ranger’s 6‑speed manual. The GS3 is a front‑wheel‑drive small crossover with five doors and five seats, making it more suitable for family or urban use; the Ranger’s rear‑wheel‑drive pickup body, two doors and a 2+3 seating layout cater to light-duty work or off‑road tasks. Warranty coverage also favors the GS3, offering 5 years/150,000 km versus the Ranger’s 3 years/100,000 km. Thus, for everyday commuting, family transport, or a budget‑conscious buyer seeking better power and warranty, the GS3 is preferable. If one needs a rugged pickup for hauling or occasional off‑road use, the Ranger remains the better fit despite its higher price and lower power output.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The GAC GS3 Emzoom R‑Style costs ₱1,139,900, while the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT is ₱1,219,000.
Which has more power?
The GS3’s 1.5‑L engine produces 177 PS at 5,500 rpm versus the Ranger’s 160 PS at 3,200 rpm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The GS3’s front‑wheel‑drive, five‑door crossover layout and higher torque range make it more suited for daily commuting than the Ranger’s rear‑wheel‑drive pickup.
Which offers a longer warranty?
The GS3 provides 5‑year/150,000 km coverage; the Ranger offers only 3‑year/100,000 km warranty.