Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Honda City Hatchback 1.5 RS CVT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Honda City Hatchback 1.5 RS CVT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Honda City Hatchback 1.5 RS CVT (2024) Honda ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 121 PS @ 6600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 145 Nm @ 4300 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Hatchback |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Hatchback |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4369 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1748 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1488 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2600 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 40 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Sonic Grey Pearl, Meteoroid Gray Metallic, Brilliant Sporty Blue Metallic, Platinum White Pearl, Ignite Red Metallic |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1143 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 16 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 185/55/R16 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 185/55/R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Honda City Hatchback 1.5 RS CVT (2024): which should you buy?
The Honda City Hatchback 1.5 RS CVT (₱1,219,000) is the better choice for most Filipino buyers seeking practicality and efficiency. Its gasoline engine delivers 121 PS—significantly more than the Ranger’s 160 PS diesel—while the CVT transmission and FWD design make daily commuting easier. The City’s 2+3 seating and hatchback profile offer greater versatility for city driving, whereas the Ranger’s RWD platform and 6-speed manual transmission prioritize off-road capability. With a 3-year/100,000km warranty, the City provides peace of mind for a newer vehicle, while the Ranger’s discontinued status and 100,000km/3-year warranty limit long-term reliability data. Choose the Ranger if you need ruggedness for heavy work; opt for the City if you value fuel economy and practicality.