Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mazda 2 1.5L Hatchback Sport (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mazda 2 1.5L Hatchback Sport (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Mazda 2 1.5L Hatchback Sport (2024) Mazda ₱1,250,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 108 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Hatchback |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Hatchback |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4090 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1515 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2570 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 44 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Soul Red Crystal, Snowflake White Pearl, Jet Black, Aero Gray Polymetal Gray, Machine Gray, Eternal Blue |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1040 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 16 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 185/60R16 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 185/60R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mazda 2 1.5L Hatchback Sport (2024): which should you buy?
These two vehicles serve completely different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your lifestyle. The Ford Ranger XLT is a body-on-frame pickup truck designed for heavy-duty work, off-road capability, and towing. It has a 2.2L turbo diesel engine producing 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, paired with a 6-speed manual transmission and rear-wheel drive. It can carry up to 5 people and has a long bed for cargo. However, it is a 2017 model and discontinued, so you'd be buying used. The Mazda 2 Hatchback Sport is a modern, fuel-efficient city car with a 1.5L gasoline engine (108 PS, 141 Nm), 6-speed automatic, and front-wheel drive. It's more agile, easier to park, and has better fuel economy for daily commuting. It's also a current model with a warranty. If you need a workhorse for hauling or off-road, get the Ranger. If you want a practical, fun-to-drive daily driver with modern features, get the Mazda 2.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger XLT (2017) is priced at ₱1,219,000, while the Mazda 2 Hatchback Sport (2024) is ₱1,250,000. The Ranger is slightly cheaper, but it's a used/discontinued model.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger has a 2.2L turbo diesel with 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, far more powerful than the Mazda 2's 1.5L gasoline engine with 108 PS and 141 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda 2 is better for daily commuting due to its smaller size, automatic transmission, better fuel efficiency (gasoline), and modern features. The Ranger is larger, manual-only, and less maneuverable in traffic.
Which has a longer warranty?
Both offer 3 years or 100,000 km warranty. However, the Mazda 2 is a current model, so the warranty is active, while the Ranger (2017) is discontinued and likely out of warranty.