Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs MG TRQ L MT 4×2 (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs MG TRQ L MT 4×2 (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | MG TRQ L MT 4×2 (2026) MG ₱1,248,888 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1966cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 161 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 400 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Manual 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pickup |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pickup |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5365 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1960 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1857 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3155 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 73 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Scarlet Red exclusive for the Automatic variant, Warm White, Astral Silver, Metal Black, and Metal Ash Gray |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1915 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf spring with shock absorber |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 16 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 245/70R16 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 245/70R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs MG TRQ L MT 4×2 (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer seeking a brand-new pickup with the latest features and a longer warranty, the MG TRQ L MT 4×2 (2026) is the clear choice. It offers slightly more power (161 PS vs 160 PS) and significantly more torque (400 Nm vs 385 Nm) than the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017), making it better for hauling and overtaking. At ₱1,248,888, it is only ₱29,888 more expensive than the Ranger’s original price, but the Ranger is now discontinued and only available used. The MG also comes with a 5-year/100,000 km warranty versus the Ranger’s 3-year/100,000 km, giving greater peace of mind. However, if your budget is tight and you prioritize proven reliability, a used Ranger (with a lower secondhand price) remains a solid workhorse. The Ranger's 2.2L engine is well-known in the Philippines, but the MG's newer platform, higher torque, and current availability make it the better buy for most buyers. Keep in mind that the MG TRQ is a new model, so long-term parts availability is unproven compared to the long-established Ranger. For daily commuting and light to medium work duties, the MG offers a compelling package at a competitive price.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Ford Ranger XLT or the MG TRQ?
The Ford Ranger XLT was priced at ₱1,219,000 when new in 2017, but it is now discontinued. The MG TRQ L MT is currently priced at ₱1,248,888, making it slightly more expensive. However, because the Ranger is only available used, its secondhand price is lower.
Which pickup has more power and torque?
The MG TRQ produces 161 PS and 400 Nm of torque, while the Ford Ranger delivers 160 PS and 385 Nm. The MG has a slight edge in both horsepower and torque, despite its smaller 2.0L engine compared to the Ranger's 2.2L.
Which vehicle has a better warranty?
The MG TRQ comes with a 5-year or 100,000 km warranty, whichever comes first. The Ford Ranger had a 3-year or 100,000 km warranty when new. Since the Ranger is discontinued, it no longer carries a manufacturer warranty unless purchased used with remaining coverage.
Which is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The MG TRQ is better suited for daily commuting because it is a brand-new model with a longer warranty and slightly higher torque, which aids in city driving and traffic. The Ford Ranger is a proven workhorse but lacks modern features and warranty support. However, a used Ranger may be more affordable for budget-conscious buyers.