Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Triton GL 2WD MT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Triton GL 2WD MT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Mitsubishi Triton GL 2WD MT (2024) Mitsubishi ₱1,266,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2439cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 183 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 430 Nm @ 2250 - 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 6-M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pickup |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pickup |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5265 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1865 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1775 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3130 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 75 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Yamabuki Orange, Solid White, Diamond White, Blade Silver, Graphite Grey, Solid Red, Jet Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1815 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 16 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/R16C |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/R16C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Triton GL 2WD MT (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing a used 2017 Ford Ranger XLT against a brand‑new 2024 Mitsubishi Triton GL, the Triton edges out on overall value despite its higher sticker price. The Triton costs ₱1,266,000, about ₱47,000 more than the Ranger, but it brings a newer 2.4‑L turbo diesel that delivers 183 PS and 430 Nm, outperforming the Ranger’s 160 PS and 385 Nm. Both are rear‑wheel‑drive, 6‑speed manual pickups with the same 4‑door, 2+3 seating layout and body‑on‑frame construction, so practicality and cargo capacity are comparable. The Triton’s warranty is also fresh (3 years/100,000 km) whereas the Ranger’s 3‑year/100,000 km coverage has likely expired, and the newer model offers a broader colour palette, which can matter for resale appeal. The Ranger, being discontinued, may have limited parts availability and resale demand. If initial outlay is the primary concern and a proven, slightly cheaper unit is acceptable, the Ranger remains a solid choice, especially for those comfortable with an older chassis. However, for buyers seeking more power, a current warranty, and the confidence of a brand‑new vehicle, the Mitsubishi Triton GL is the better long‑term investment.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The 2017 Ford Ranger XLT is cheaper at ₱1,219,000, while the 2024 Mitsubishi Triton GL costs ₱1,266,000.
Which pickup has more power and torque?
The Mitsubishi Triton GL provides more power (183 PS vs 160 PS) and higher torque (430 Nm vs 385 Nm) compared to the Ford Ranger XLT.
Is the warranty still valid on either vehicle?
Both models come with a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, but the Ranger’s warranty is likely expired as the vehicle is from 2017, whereas the Triton’s warranty is fresh.
Which option is better for daily commuting and long‑term reliability?
The new Mitsubishi Triton GL offers a current warranty, newer engine technology and likely better parts availability, making it more suitable for daily use and long‑term reliability, while the older Ranger may require more maintenance and has limited availability.