Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Triton GL 4WD MT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Triton GL 4WD MT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Mitsubishi Triton GL 4WD MT (2024) Mitsubishi ₱1,292,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2439cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 183 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 430 Nm @ 2250 - 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 6-M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pickup |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pickup |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5265 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1865 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1775 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3130 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 75 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Yamabuki Orange, Solid White, Diamond White, Blade Silver, Graphite Grey, Solid Red, Jet Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1815 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 16" steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 16" steel |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/R16C |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/R16C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Triton GL 4WD MT (2024): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2017 is the better value for most Filipino buyers, priced at ₱1,219,000 versus ₱1,292,000 for the Mitsubishi Triton 2024. While the Triton offers 183 PS vs 160 PS and 430 Nm vs 385 Nm of torque—meaning stronger performance—the Ranger’s discontinued status means no warranty extension, and its 6-speed manual transmission may feel less refined for daily driving. The Triton’s 2024 model is current with a 3-year/100,000km warranty, adding confidence. If budget is tight and you prioritize raw power for hauling, the Triton wins; otherwise, the Ranger offers reliability and lower cost with a dependable 100,000km/3-year warranty. Both are 4-door pick-ups with 2+3 seating, but the Ranger’s simpler drivetrain and discontinued market could limit resale value.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2017 costs ₱1,219,000, while the Mitsubishi Triton 2024 costs ₱1,292,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Mitsubishi Triton 2024 delivers 183 PS vs 160 PS, with 430 Nm vs 385 Nm of torque.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2017 has a 6-speed manual transmission, which may feel less refined for daily driving compared to the Triton's setup.
Is the Triton’s warranty better?
Yes, the Mitsubishi Triton 2024 offers a 3-year/100,000km warranty, whereas the Ford Ranger XLT 2017 has a 100,000km/3-year warranty.