Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Nissan Livina 1.5 EL A/T (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Nissan Livina 1.5 EL A/T (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Nissan Livina 1.5 EL A/T (2023) Nissan ₱1,174,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 104 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 141 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 4-A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4510 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1700 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Black Knight, White Pearl, Silver Tech, Timeless Grey, Ruby Red |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1250 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 185/65/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 185/65/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Nissan Livina 1.5 EL A/T (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer comparing the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) and the Nissan Livina 1.5 EL A/T (2023), the choice hinges on purpose and priorities. The Ranger is a discontinued diesel pickup with 160 PS and 385 Nm torque, offering superior towing and off-road capability. However, it's a manual, rear-wheel-drive body-on-frame vehicle, less ideal for daily city driving. Priced at ₱1,219,000, it's ₱45,000 more than the Livina. The Livina (₱1,174,000) is a current model with a 5-year/150,000km warranty, automatic transmission, and unibody construction—smoother for urban commuting. It seats seven (2+3+2) versus the Ranger's five, making it better for families. The Livina's 104 PS gasoline engine is less powerful but more fuel-efficient (not specified) and easier to drive in traffic. If you need a workhorse for hauling or rough terrain, choose the Ranger. For a daily family vehicle with lower running costs, more seats, and modern conveniences, the Livina is the better buy. The Ranger's 2017 model year and discontinuation also mean potential parts scarcity; the Livina benefits from current support. Ultimately, the Livina appeals to commuters and families, the Ranger to contractors or enthusiasts. Consider your primary use—hauling versus people-moving—to decide.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: the Ford Ranger or the Nissan Livina?
The Nissan Livina 1.5 EL A/T (₱1,174,000) is ₱45,000 cheaper than the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (₱1,219,000).
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger is significantly more powerful, with 160 PS and 385 Nm torque versus the Nissan Livina's 104 PS and 141 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Nissan Livina is better for city commuting: it has an automatic transmission, unibody construction for a smoother ride, and a gasoline engine that's quieter and likely more efficient in stop-and-go traffic. The Ranger's manual transmission and diesel engine may be less convenient.
Which is more practical for a family with 7 passengers?
The Nissan Livina seats 7 people (2+3+2) and has a lower price, making it more practical for families. The Ford Ranger only seats 5 and is better for cargo than passengers.