Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Toyota Ativ 1.5 HEV CVT (Platinum white pearl mica/Attitude black mica) (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Toyota Ativ 1.5 HEV CVT (Platinum white pearl mica/Attitude black mica) (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Toyota Ativ 1.5 HEV CVT (Platinum white pearl mica/Attitude black mica) (2026) Toyota ₱1,208,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 150,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 91 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 121 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Family Sedan |
| Segment | Pick-Up | FS |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4425 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1740 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1480 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2620 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 36 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Platinum White Pearl, Scarlet SE, Gray Metallic, Black Metallic Mica |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1140 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 16 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 195/60R16 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 195/60R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Toyota Ativ 1.5 HEV CVT (Platinum white pearl mica/Attitude black mica) (2026): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers deciding between the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4x2 MT (2017) at ₱1,219,000 and the Toyota Ativ 1.5 HEV CVT (2026) at ₱1,208,000, the choice hinges on purpose. The Ranger is a body-on-frame pickup with a turbocharged diesel engine producing 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, paired with a 6-speed manual and RWD. It's discontinued and has a shorter warranty (3 years/100,000 km). It suits off-road, heavy hauling, or towing needs, but its fuel consumption is higher and it's outdated. The Ativ is a current unibody hybrid sedan with a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine and CVT, delivering 91 PS and 121 Nm—far less power but exceptional fuel efficiency. It comes with a longer 5-year/150,000 km warranty and modern features. For daily commuting in Metro Manila, the Ativ's hybrid powertrain offers significant fuel savings and lower emissions, while the Ranger excels in utility. If you need a workhorse for construction or provincial driving, the Ranger is more capable despite its age. For a family sedan prioritizing economy and reliability, the Ativ is the smarter buy due to its hybrid technology and warranty.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: Ford Ranger or Toyota Ativ?
The Toyota Ativ is slightly cheaper at ₱1,208,000 compared to the Ford Ranger at ₱1,219,000, a difference of ₱11,000.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger has significantly more power with 160 PS and 385 Nm torque, versus the Toyota Ativ's 91 PS and 121 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota Ativ is better for daily commuting due to its hybrid powertrain (better fuel economy) and longer 5-year warranty. The Ranger's diesel engine and manual transmission are less efficient in stop-and-go traffic.
Which has a better warranty?
The Toyota Ativ offers a 5-year or 150,000 km warranty, while the Ford Ranger (discontinued) had a 3-year or 100,000 km warranty.