Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025) Toyota ₱1,142,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 150 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 343 Nm @ 2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Manual |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Van |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+12 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5303 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 2097 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3085 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 55 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1905 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf spring with shock absorber |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 14 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025): which should you buy?
Between the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) and the Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025), the choice depends on your primary use. If you need a traditional pickup for light hauling and prefer a more powerful engine (160 PS, 385 Nm vs 150 PS, 343 Nm), the Ranger is a strong contender—but it's a discontinued 2017 model, so you'll need to find a used unit. For those prioritizing passenger and cargo capacity, the Tamaraw is the clear winner: it seats up to 14 people (2+12) versus the Ranger's 5, comes in a van body style ideal for family or commercial use, and costs ₱77,000 less (₱1,142,000 vs ₱1,219,000). The Tamaraw also benefits from being a current model with full warranty. The Ranger’s higher torque (385 Nm vs 343 Nm) gives it better towing capability, but its pickup bed is less versatile for passengers. Ultimately, the Tamaraw offers better value and practicality for most Filipino buyers, especially those needing a people-mover or work van. If you insist on a pickup and don't mind a used vehicle, the Ranger is more powerful but older and more expensive.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Toyota Tamaraw is cheaper at ₱1,142,000 compared to the Ford Ranger at ₱1,219,000.
Which has more power?
The Ford Ranger has more power with 160 PS and 385 Nm torque, versus the Tamaraw's 150 PS and 343 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Tamaraw is better for daily commuting if you need to carry many passengers (14 seats), while the Ranger is a standard pickup for personal or light cargo use.
Which is more practical for a family?
The Toyota Tamaraw is more practical for a family due to its 14-seat capacity, while the Ranger seats only 5 and has a pickup bed.