Mazda BT-50 3.2 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 3.2 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 3.2 4×4 AT (2017) Mazda ₱1,550,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Diesel | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4x4 | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Van |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2218 | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid, Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Dual Zone Temperature Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
The Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT and Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T serve completely different purposes, so your choice depends on your primary need. The BT-50 is a powerful pickup truck with 200 PS and 470 Nm torque, ideal for off-road driving, towing, or heavy-duty work. It has a 6-speed automatic transmission and 4x4 drivetrain, making it easier to drive in rough terrain. In contrast, the NV350 Urvan is a passenger van with 129 PS and 356 Nm torque, designed for transporting people. It has a 5-speed manual transmission and rear-wheel drive, better suited for city driving or shuttle services. The BT-50 is slightly cheaper at ₱1,550,000 vs ₱1,570,000 for the NV350. If you need a workhorse for hauling and off-road capability, choose the BT-50. If you need a people carrier for up to 15 passengers (though seating capacity not specified, typical for vans), choose the NV350. Both have similar warranty (3 years/100,000 km).
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mazda BT-50 is cheaper at ₱1,550,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan at ₱1,570,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Mazda BT-50 is significantly more powerful with 200 PS and 470 Nm torque, versus the NV350's 129 PS and 356 Nm torque.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is better for daily commuting if you need to transport multiple passengers, as it is a van. The Mazda BT-50 is a pickup truck better suited for work or off-road use.
Which has better off-road capability?
The Mazda BT-50 has better off-road capability due to its 4x4 drivetrain, higher ground clearance (not specified but typical for pickups), and more powerful engine.