Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD (2017) Mazda ₱1,600,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 148 PS @ 6000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 192 Nm @ 2800 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Van |
| Segment | J | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4275 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1535 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1290 | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 44 | 65 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam Axle | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 215/50 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/50 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2017 Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD and the 2018 Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T, the choice hinges on intended use. The CX-3 (₱1,600,000) is a compact crossover with a 2.0L gas engine producing 148 PS and 192 Nm, paired with a 6-speed automatic and AWD. It offers a car-like driving experience, better for daily city commutes and occasional light off-road, but lacks space and cargo capacity. The NV350 (₱1,570,000) is a body-on-frame van with a 2.5L turbo diesel generating 129 PS and a substantial 356 Nm of torque (available from 1400 rpm), mated to a 5-speed manual and RWD. Its diesel engine delivers strong low-end torque for hauling passengers or cargo, making it ideal for business use, family transport, or long-distance travel. The CX-3 is more powerful in horsepower and has AWD for wet roads, while the NV350's diesel is more fuel-efficient and torquier for heavy loads. Choose the CX-3 if you prioritize style, comfort, and driving dynamics for personal use. Choose the NV350 if you need maximum practicality, durability, and torque for commercial or large-family needs.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Mazda CX-3 or Nissan NV350 Urvan?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is slightly cheaper at ₱1,570,000 compared to the Mazda CX-3 at ₱1,600,000, a difference of ₱30,000.
Which vehicle has more horsepower?
The Mazda CX-3 produces 148 PS, which is higher than the Nissan NV350 Urvan's 129 PS. However, the NV350 has significantly more torque (356 Nm vs 192 Nm).
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Mazda CX-3 is better for daily commuting due to its compact size, automatic transmission, and AWD for better traction. The NV350's manual transmission and larger dimensions make it less convenient in heavy traffic.
Which vehicle is more suitable for long trips and hauling cargo?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is more suitable for long trips and hauling cargo thanks to its turbo diesel engine with high torque (356 Nm), body-on-frame construction, and van body type offering generous space.