Mazda CX-3 2.0 Pro FWD (2017) vs Isuzu D-Max 3.0 LS 4×2 MT (2021)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-3 2.0 Pro FWD (2017) vs Isuzu D-Max 3.0 LS 4×2 MT (2021) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-3 2.0 Pro FWD (2017) Mazda ₱1,290,000 | Isuzu D-Max 3.0 LS 4×2 MT (2021) Isuzu ₱1,320,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2021 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | — |
| Availability | Current | — |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbo Intercooler Blue Power Diesel, semi midship weight distribution |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 148 PS @ 6000 rpm | 190 PS @ 3600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 192 Nm @ 2800 rpm | 450 Nm @ 1600 - 2600 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | — |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | — |
| Segment | J | — |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | — |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | — |
| Length (mm) | 4275 | — |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | — |
| Height (mm) | 1535 | — |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | — |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1223 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 44 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | — |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam Axle | — |
| Front Wheels | 16 Alloy | — |
| Rear Wheels | 16 Alloy | — |
| Front Tires | 215/50 R16 | — |
| Rear Tires | 215/50 R16 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | — |
| Differential Lock | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | — |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | — |
| Brake Assist | Yes | — |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | — |
| Stability Control | No | — |
| Traction Control | No | — |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | — |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | — |
| Hill Start Assist | No | — |
| Hill Descent Control | No | — |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | — |
| Driver Airbag | No | — |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | — |
| Passenger Airbag | No | — |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | — |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | — |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | — |
| Security Alarm | Yes | — |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | — |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | — |
| Seat Material | Leather | — |
| Parking Brake | Manual | — |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | — |
| Cruise Control | No | — |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | — |
| Paddle Shifters | No | — |
| Reverse Camera | No | — |
| Auto Headlights | No | — |
| Power Windows | Yes | — |
| Power Seats | No | — |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | — |
| Eco Mode | No | — |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Navigation | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Apple CarPlay | No | — |
| Android Auto | No | — |
| USB | Yes | — |
| AUX Input | Yes | — |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | — |
| CD Player | Yes | — |
| DVD Player | No | — |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | — |
| iPod Support | No | — |
| SD Card Slot | No | — |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | — |
| Fog Lights | Yes | — |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | — |
Mazda CX-3 2.0 Pro FWD (2017) vs Isuzu D-Max 3.0 LS 4×2 MT (2021): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality, performance and cost, the Mazda CX‑3 2.0 Pro FWD offers a more affordable entry point at ₱1,290,000 compared to the Isuzu D‑Max 3.0 LS 4×2 MT priced at ₱1,320,000. The CX‑3’s compact crossover design (length 4,275 mm) and five‑door layout make it well suited for urban driving, tight parking, and family use with a 2+3 seating configuration. Its 1.998 L naturally aspirated engine delivers 148 PS at 6,000 rpm and 192 Nm torque at 2,800 rpm, while the D‑Max’s larger 2.999 L turbo diesel provides higher power (190 PS at 3,600 rpm) and a substantial torque of 450 Nm between 1,600–2,600 rpm—beneficial for heavier loads or occasional towing. The CX‑3 comes with a 6‑speed automatic transmission and front‑wheel drive, whereas the D‑Max uses a manual gearbox and rear‑wheel drive, offering more rugged capability but requiring driver skill. Warranty coverage is similar (3 years or 100,000 km). If daily commuting, city maneuverability and lower purchase price are priorities, the CX‑3 is preferable. If you need stronger towing capacity or a diesel engine for longer trips and heavier payloads, the D‑Max is the better choice. Ultimately, the decision hinges on whether you value compact urban practicality or higher torque and diesel efficiency for off‑road or heavy‑load scenarios.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda CX‑3 2.0 Pro FWD costs ₱1,290,000, while the Isuzu D‑Max 3.0 LS 4×2 MT costs ₱1,320,000.
Which has more power?
The Isuzu D‑Max’s 2.999 L turbo diesel produces 190 PS at 3,600 rpm versus the Mazda CX‑3’s 148 PS at 6,000 rpm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda CX‑3’s compact crossover size, 5‑door layout and automatic transmission make it more suited for city driving and daily commuting.
Which offers better torque for towing?
The Isuzu D‑Max delivers 450 Nm of torque between 1,600–2,600 rpm, far exceeding the Mazda CX‑3’s 192 Nm at 2,800 rpm.