Mazda CX-3 2.0 Sport FWD (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-3 2.0 Sport FWD (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-3 2.0 Sport FWD (2017) Mazda ₱1,510,000 | Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026) Ford ₱1,399,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 148 PS @ 6000 rpm | 150 PS |
| Max Torque | 192 Nm @ 2800 rpm | 230 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4275 | 4685 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1935 |
| Height (mm) | 1535 | 1706 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2726 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1223 | 1611 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 44 | 60 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Blue Panther, Crystal Pearl White, Oasis Green, Panther Black, Star White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam Axle | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Front Tires | 215/50 R18 | 235/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/50 R18 | 235/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda CX-3 2.0 Sport FWD (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, performance, and practicality, the Ford Territory Hybrid Trend 2026 edges out the Mazda CX‑3 2.0 Sport 2017. The Territory is priced lower at ₱1,399,000 versus ₱1,510,000 for the CX‑3, giving a direct saving of ₱111,000. Power output is comparable, with the Territory delivering 150 PS (just 2 PS more) and a higher torque of 230 Nm against the CX‑3’s 192 Nm, which translates to better low‑end pull for city driving. The hybrid power‑train also promises better fuel efficiency, though exact figures aren’t listed. Both models share a 5‑door, 5‑seat layout and front‑wheel drive, but the Territory’s midsize crossover SUV body offers a slightly larger presence than the CX‑3’s compact crossover dimensions (length 4,275 mm for the CX‑3; Territory length not specified). Warranty terms are identical (3 years/100,000 km). If budget and a modest power advantage are priorities, the Territory is the clear choice. However, buyers who prefer a proven 2017 model, value the slightly longer heritage of Mazda’s styling, or need the exact length spec for tight parking may still consider the CX‑3.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Ford Territory Hybrid Trend 2026 costs ₱1,399,000, which is ₱111,000 less than the Mazda CX‑3 2.0 Sport 2017 priced at ₱1,510,000.
Which vehicle offers more power and torque?
Both have similar power, with the Territory at 150 PS and the CX‑3 at 148 PS, but the Territory provides more torque at 230 Nm versus the CX‑3’s 192 Nm.
Are the warranties the same?
Yes, both models come with a 3‑year or 100,000 km warranty.
Which is better suited for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Territory’s hybrid system and higher low‑end torque make it more fuel‑efficient and responsive in stop‑and‑go traffic, while its lower price adds to daily affordability; the CX‑3 remains a viable option if a buyer prefers a compact crossover size.