Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (2017) Mazda ₱1,650,000 Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) Nissan ₱1,570,000
Overview
Model Year 2017 2018
Warranty 100,000 km/3-years 3-years/ 100,000km
Availability Current Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 1998cc 2488cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Natural aspirated Turbocharged
Fuel Type Gas Diesel
Max Power 155 PS @ 6000 rpm 129 PS @ 3200 rpm
Max Torque 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm
Transmission 6-Speed AT 5-Speed M/T
Drivetrain FWD RWD
Compression Ratio 15:1
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Crossover Van
Segment J Van
Construction Unibody Body on Frame
Doors 5 3
Seating Capacity 2+3 15
Length (mm) 4550 4695
Width (mm) 1840 1695
Height (mm) 1675 1990
Wheelbase (mm) 2700 2555
Curb Weight (kg) 1514 2076
Fuel Tank (L) 56 65
Exterior Colors Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson Strut Torsion Beam
Rear Suspension Multi-Link Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring
Front Wheels 17 Alloy 15 steel
Rear Wheels 17 Alloy 15 steel
Front Tires 225/65 R17 195/70/R15
Rear Tires 225/65 R17 195/70/R15
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Drum
Steering Type EPS Hydraulic
Steering Column Tilt & Telescopic Tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring Yes No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist Yes No
Parking Sensors Yes No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes No
Front Curtain Airbags Yes No
Rear Curtain Airbags Yes No
Rear Side Airbags Yes No
Engine Immobilizer Yes No
Security Alarm Yes No
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Auto Climate Control System Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Leather Fabric
Parking Brake EPB Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start Yes No
Cruise Control Yes No
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera Yes No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats Yes No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 4
Touchscreen Yes No
Navigation Yes No
Bluetooth Yes No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes No
AUX Input Yes No
AM/FM Radio Yes No
CD Player Yes No
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback Yes No
iPod Support No No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights LED Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights Yes No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?

The Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (₱1,650,000) is the better choice for most Filipino buyers seeking practicality and comfort. Its 155 PS engine delivers stronger acceleration for a crossover, while the 6-speed automatic transmission simplifies daily driving. The CX-5’s 2+3 seating and unibody construction make it easier to navigate urban traffic. The Nissan NV350 Urvan (₱1,570,000) is more suited for heavy-duty work due to its 356 Nm torque and 5-speed manual transmission, but it lacks the passenger-focused features of the CX-5. Price difference: ₱80,000; power gap: 26 PS; drivetrain: FWD vs RWD. Choose the CX-5 for commuting or family use; the NV350 for hauling goods.