Mazda CX-5 2.5 AWD Sport (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-5 2.5 AWD Sport (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Mazda CX-5 2.5 AWD Sport (2017) Mazda ₱1,950,000 Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000
Overview
Model Year 2017 2018
Warranty 100,000 km/3-years 100,000 km/3-years
Availability Current Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2488cc 2999cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Natural aspirated Turbo Intercooler
Fuel Type Gas Diesel
Max Power 190 PS @ 6000 rpm 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm
Max Torque 251 Nm @ 4000 rpm 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm
Transmission 6-Speed AT 6-Speed A/T
Drivetrain AWD RWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Crossover SUV
Segment J J
Construction Unibody
Doors 5 4
Seating Capacity 2+3 2+3
Length (mm) 4550 4825
Width (mm) 1840 1860
Height (mm) 1680 1840
Wheelbase (mm) 2700 2845
Curb Weight (kg) 1626
Fuel Tank (L) 58 65
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson Strut Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer
Rear Suspension Multi-Link 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer
Front Wheels 19 Alloy 18 Alloy
Rear Wheels 19 Alloy 18 Alloy
Front Tires 225/55 R19 255/60 R18
Rear Tires 225/55 R19 255/60 R18
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Disc
Steering Type EPS Power Asisted
Steering Column Tilt & Telescopic Tilt & Telescopic
Tire Pressure Monitoring Yes No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist Yes Yes
Parking Sensors Yes Yes
Stability Control No Yes
Traction Control No Yes
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No Yes
Hill Descent Control No Yes
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes Yes
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes Yes
Front Curtain Airbags Yes No
Rear Curtain Airbags Yes No
Rear Side Airbags Yes No
Engine Immobilizer Yes Yes
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Auto Climate Control System Auto Climate Control System
Rear A/C Vents Yes Yes
Seat Material Leather Leather
Parking Brake EPB Manual
Key Type Smart Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start Yes Yes
Cruise Control Yes Yes
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera Yes Yes
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats Yes Yes
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 10 6
Touchscreen Yes Yes
Navigation Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No Yes
MP3 Playback Yes Yes
iPod Support No Yes
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights LED LED
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights Yes Yes
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Mazda CX-5 2.5 AWD Sport (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer weighing two current vehicles in the same segment, the Mazda CX‑5 2.5 AWD Sport offers a more balanced package for everyday use and light off‑road adventures, while the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 focuses on power and durability for heavier loads. The CX‑5 is priced ₱1,950,000 versus the mu‑X’s ₱1,845,000, making the latter slightly cheaper. However, the mu‑X’s 3.0‑liter diesel engine delivers a higher torque of 380 Nm compared to the CX‑5’s 251 Nm, which translates into better pulling power and fuel efficiency on rough terrain. The CX‑5’s 2.5‑liter gasoline engine produces 190 PS, a touch more than the mu‑X’s 177 PS, giving it a slight edge in straight‑line acceleration. In terms of drivetrain, the CX‑5’s AWD system is ideal for Manila traffic and occasional wet roads, whereas the mu‑X’s RWD may struggle in heavy rain or muddy conditions. Both cars share a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty and similar seating capacity (2+3). The CX‑5’s unibody construction and 4550 mm length make it more maneuverable in tight city streets, while the mu‑X’s longer 4825 mm body and 1860 mm width provide a more robust presence on highways. If you prioritize all‑weather traction, easier handling in urban settings, and a slightly higher power output for daily commuting, the Mazda CX‑5 is the better choice. If you need a vehicle with greater torque for towing or heavier loads, and slightly lower purchase price, the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A is preferable.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper?

The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT is priced at ₱1,845,000, while the Mazda CX‑5 2.5 AWD Sport is priced at ₱1,950,000.

Which has more power?

The Mazda CX‑5’s 2.5‑liter gasoline engine produces 190 PS, slightly higher than the Isuzu mu‑X’s 177 PS diesel engine.

Which offers better torque for heavy loads?

The Isuzu mu‑X provides 380 Nm of torque, compared to the Mazda CX‑5’s 251 Nm, making it better for towing or heavy payloads.

Which is more suitable for daily commuting in Manila?

The Mazda CX‑5’s AWD system and shorter length (4550 mm) make it more maneuverable and better suited for city traffic, while the Isuzu mu‑X’s RWD may be less ideal in wet or congested conditions.