Mazda CX-5 2.5 AWD Sport (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-5 2.5 AWD Sport (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-5 2.5 AWD Sport (2017) Mazda ₱1,950,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Natural aspirated | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 190 PS @ 6000 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 251 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed AT | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4550 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1840 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1680 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1626 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 58 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 19 Alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 19 Alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 225/55 R19 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55 R19 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda CX-5 2.5 AWD Sport (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing two current vehicles in the same segment, the Mazda CX‑5 2.5 AWD Sport offers a more balanced package for everyday use and light off‑road adventures, while the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 focuses on power and durability for heavier loads. The CX‑5 is priced ₱1,950,000 versus the mu‑X’s ₱1,845,000, making the latter slightly cheaper. However, the mu‑X’s 3.0‑liter diesel engine delivers a higher torque of 380 Nm compared to the CX‑5’s 251 Nm, which translates into better pulling power and fuel efficiency on rough terrain. The CX‑5’s 2.5‑liter gasoline engine produces 190 PS, a touch more than the mu‑X’s 177 PS, giving it a slight edge in straight‑line acceleration. In terms of drivetrain, the CX‑5’s AWD system is ideal for Manila traffic and occasional wet roads, whereas the mu‑X’s RWD may struggle in heavy rain or muddy conditions. Both cars share a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty and similar seating capacity (2+3). The CX‑5’s unibody construction and 4550 mm length make it more maneuverable in tight city streets, while the mu‑X’s longer 4825 mm body and 1860 mm width provide a more robust presence on highways. If you prioritize all‑weather traction, easier handling in urban settings, and a slightly higher power output for daily commuting, the Mazda CX‑5 is the better choice. If you need a vehicle with greater torque for towing or heavier loads, and slightly lower purchase price, the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A is preferable.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT is priced at ₱1,845,000, while the Mazda CX‑5 2.5 AWD Sport is priced at ₱1,950,000.
Which has more power?
The Mazda CX‑5’s 2.5‑liter gasoline engine produces 190 PS, slightly higher than the Isuzu mu‑X’s 177 PS diesel engine.
Which offers better torque for heavy loads?
The Isuzu mu‑X provides 380 Nm of torque, compared to the Mazda CX‑5’s 251 Nm, making it better for towing or heavy payloads.
Which is more suitable for daily commuting in Manila?
The Mazda CX‑5’s AWD system and shorter length (4550 mm) make it more maneuverable and better suited for city traffic, while the Isuzu mu‑X’s RWD may be less ideal in wet or congested conditions.