Mitsubishi Strada GT 2.4 MT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Strada GT 2.4 MT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Strada GT 2.4 MT (2017) Mitsubishi ₱1,575,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2442cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler MIVEC, VGT | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 181 PS @ 3500 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 430 Nm @ 2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Van |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5370 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1815 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1780 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3000 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1835 | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 75 | 65 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring and Stabilizer Bar | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Elliptic Leaf Spring with Telescopic Shock Absorber | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 245/65 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 245/45 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mitsubishi Strada GT 2.4 MT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing a work‑horse pickup against a people‑carrier van, the Mitsubishi Strada GT 2.4 MT (2017) edges out the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) in overall capability despite a marginal price gap of ₱5,000. The Strada delivers 181 PS and 430 Nm of torque, far surpassing the Urvan’s 129 PS and 356 Nm, and its 6‑speed manual and 4WD drivetrain give it superior hauling power and off‑road confidence for construction sites or rural deliveries. Its body‑on‑frame construction and longer wheelbase (5,370 mm) also provide a sturdier platform for heavy loads, while still seating up to five (2+3). The Urvan, priced almost the same, offers a 5‑speed manual, rear‑wheel drive and three doors, making it a practical choice for passenger transport or small‑business shuttle services, but it lacks the torque, power and 4WD capability needed for rugged cargo work. Both carry a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, but the Strada’s higher output and drivetrain flexibility make it the better pick for buyers needing a versatile, high‑torque work vehicle; the Urvan suits those whose primary need is moving people rather than heavy goods.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T is priced at ₱1,570,000, slightly cheaper by ₱5,000 than the Mitsubishi Strada GT 2.4 MT at ₱1,575,000.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Mitsubishi Strada GT 2.4 MT produces 181 PS and 430 Nm of torque, whereas the Nissan NV350 Urvan delivers 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Is either vehicle better for off‑road or heavy‑load work?
Yes, the Strada’s 4WD system, higher torque, and 6‑speed manual make it more suitable for off‑road and heavy‑load tasks than the Urvan’s RWD setup.
Which vehicle is more practical for passenger transport?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan, being a van with three doors and designed for passenger use, is more practical for daily commuting and shuttle services, while the Strada is a pickup with 2+3 seating.