Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017) Nissan ₱1,836,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000km | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 15:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Intercooled, VGS | Turbo Intercooler |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Fuel Type | — | Diesel |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Segment | M | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 15 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5230 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1880 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 15 steel | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 15 steel | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 195/70/R15 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 195/70/R15 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017) and the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) hinges on intended use. The Urvan is a 15-seater van with a body-on-frame construction, ideal for passenger transport or fleet operations. It has a lower price at ₱1,836,000 but is discontinued, so only used units are available. Its engine produces 129 PS and 356 Nm of torque, paired with a 5-speed automatic. The mu-X is a current-model SUV with a 6-speed automatic, more powerful at 177 PS and 380 Nm, and seats 5. It costs slightly more at ₱1,845,000 but offers modern features and better on-road driving dynamics. For daily commuting or family use, the mu-X is more comfortable and fuel-efficient. For commercial passenger hauling, the Urvan's higher seating capacity and body-on-frame durability are advantageous. However, the Urvan's discontinued status may affect parts availability and resale value. Ultimately, the mu-X is the better all-rounder for most private buyers, while the Urvan suits specific commercial needs.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017) is cheaper at ₱1,836,000 compared to the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) at ₱1,845,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Isuzu mu-X is more powerful with 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, versus the Nissan Urvan's 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its SUV body type, lower seating capacity (5 seats), and more modern 6-speed automatic transmission, offering better comfort and fuel efficiency.
Which has more seating capacity?
The Nissan Urvan seats 15 passengers, while the Isuzu mu-X seats only 5 (2+3 layout).