Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2017) Nissan ₱1,776,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 256 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Segment | M | J |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 15 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5230 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1880 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2190 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Stabilizer | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 15'' Steel | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 15'' Steel | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 195 R15C | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 195 R15C | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality versus performance, the Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT stands out as the more versatile choice when budget and passenger capacity are priorities. Priced at ₱1,776,000—₱69,000 cheaper than the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT—the Urvan offers a generous seating capacity of 15, making it ideal for family or commercial use. Its diesel inline‑4 engine delivers 129 PS at 3,200 rpm and a torque of 256 Nm between 1,400–2,000 rpm, which is adequate for daily commuting and light cargo. The Urvan’s FWD drivetrain and 5‑speed manual transmission keep maintenance simple, though it lacks the modern conveniences of a contemporary SUV. Conversely, the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT commands a higher price of ₱1,845,000 and provides significantly more power—177 PS at 3,550–3,650 rpm—and torque of 380 Nm between 1,800–2,800 rpm. Its RWD layout and 6‑speed automatic transmission make it better suited for off‑road or rugged driving, yet its seating capacity of only 5 limits family use. Therefore, if the buyer needs a cost‑effective vehicle with ample seating for passengers or cargo, the Urvan is preferable; if higher performance and a more modern SUV experience are desired, the mu‑X is the better pick despite its higher cost and smaller passenger capacity.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT costs ₱1,776,000, while the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT costs ₱1,845,000, making the Urvan cheaper by ₱69,000.
Which has more power?
The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT delivers 177 PS, compared to the Urvan’s 129 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
Both are diesel and suitable for daily use, but the Urvan’s lower price, larger seating capacity (15 vs. 5), and manual transmission may appeal more to commuters needing space or cost savings.
Which offers better torque?
The Isuzu mu‑X provides 380 Nm of torque, significantly higher than the Urvan’s 256 Nm.