Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2017) Nissan ₱1,776,000 Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000
Overview
Model Year 2017 2018
Warranty 100,000 km/3-years 100,000 km/3-years
Availability Discontinued Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2488cc 2999cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Turbocharged Turbo Intercooler
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Max Power 129 PS @ 3200 rpm 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm
Max Torque 256 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed M/T 6-Speed A/T
Drivetrain FWD RWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Van SUV
Segment M J
Doors 4 4
Seating Capacity 15 2+3
Length (mm) 5230 4825
Width (mm) 1880 1860
Height (mm) 2285 1840
Wheelbase (mm) 2940 2845
Curb Weight (kg) 2190
Fuel Tank (L) 65 65
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Torsion Bar with Stabilizer Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer
Rear Suspension Leaf Spring 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer
Front Wheels 15'' Steel 18 Alloy
Rear Wheels 15'' Steel 18 Alloy
Front Tires 195 R15C 255/60 R18
Rear Tires 195 R15C 255/60 R18
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Disc
Steering Type EPS Power Asisted
Steering Column Tilt Tilt & Telescopic
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist No Yes
Parking Sensors No Yes
Stability Control No Yes
Traction Control No Yes
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No Yes
Hill Descent Control No Yes
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes Yes
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes Yes
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer No Yes
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Aircon Auto Climate Control System
Rear A/C Vents Yes Yes
Seat Material Fabric Leather
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No Yes
Cruise Control No Yes
Multi-Info Display No Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No Yes
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No Yes
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 4 6
Touchscreen No Yes
Navigation No Yes
Bluetooth No Yes
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No Yes
MP3 Playback Yes Yes
iPod Support No Yes
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen LED
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No Yes
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality versus performance, the Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT stands out as the more versatile choice when budget and passenger capacity are priorities. Priced at ₱1,776,000—₱69,000 cheaper than the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT—the Urvan offers a generous seating capacity of 15, making it ideal for family or commercial use. Its diesel inline‑4 engine delivers 129 PS at 3,200 rpm and a torque of 256 Nm between 1,400–2,000 rpm, which is adequate for daily commuting and light cargo. The Urvan’s FWD drivetrain and 5‑speed manual transmission keep maintenance simple, though it lacks the modern conveniences of a contemporary SUV. Conversely, the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT commands a higher price of ₱1,845,000 and provides significantly more power—177 PS at 3,550–3,650 rpm—and torque of 380 Nm between 1,800–2,800 rpm. Its RWD layout and 6‑speed automatic transmission make it better suited for off‑road or rugged driving, yet its seating capacity of only 5 limits family use. Therefore, if the buyer needs a cost‑effective vehicle with ample seating for passengers or cargo, the Urvan is preferable; if higher performance and a more modern SUV experience are desired, the mu‑X is the better pick despite its higher cost and smaller passenger capacity.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper?

The Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT costs ₱1,776,000, while the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT costs ₱1,845,000, making the Urvan cheaper by ₱69,000.

Which has more power?

The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT delivers 177 PS, compared to the Urvan’s 129 PS.

Which is better for daily commuting?

Both are diesel and suitable for daily use, but the Urvan’s lower price, larger seating capacity (15 vs. 5), and manual transmission may appeal more to commuters needing space or cost savings.

Which offers better torque?

The Isuzu mu‑X provides 380 Nm of torque, significantly higher than the Urvan’s 256 Nm.