Porsche 718 Cayman Standard (2017) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Porsche 718 Cayman Standard (2017) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Porsche 718 Cayman Standard (2017) Porsche | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1988cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 300 PS @ 6500 rpm | 394 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1950-4500 rpm | 676 Nm |
| Transmission | 7-speed PDK | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | 4.9 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 275 km/h | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4379 | 4713 |
| Width (mm) | 1994 | 1881 |
| Height (mm) | 1295 | 1627 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2475 | 2984 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1365 | 2084 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 54 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Lightweight Spring-Strut | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Lightweight Spring-Strut | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19” alloy | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 19” alloy | 19 |
| Front Tires | 235/40 ZR19 | 225/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 265/40 ZR19 | 225/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Electric Assist | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt and telescoping | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | Yes | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | BI – Xenon | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Porsche 718 Cayman Standard (2017) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers deciding between the 2017 Porsche 718 Cayman and the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD, the choice hinges on lifestyle and budget. The Mustang Mach‑E is the only vehicle with a stated price (₱3,499,000), making it a clear option around that budget. It offers greater practicality as a midsize SUV with five seats, all‑wheel drive, and a large electric powertrain producing 394 PS and 676 Nm—more power and torque than the Porsche. The Cayman, on the other hand, is a dedicated sports coupe with a turbocharged flat‑4 (300 PS, 380 Nm), rear‑wheel drive, and a 7‑speed PDK, delivering a 0‑60 mph time of 4.9 seconds and a top speed of 275 km/h. It lacks rear seats and cargo space, making it less suitable for daily commuting or family use. The Mustang Mach‑E’s electric motor means lower running costs (no gasoline) and instant torque, ideal for city driving. However, the Cayman provides a more engaging driving experience and potentially lower depreciation as a classic sports car. Ultimately, choose the Mustang Mach‑E if you need a spacious, electrified daily driver with AWD; choose the Cayman if you prioritize pure performance and driving thrills in a compact coupe—provided you can source one (no price given).
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
Only the Ford Mustang Mach‑E has a listed price of ₱3,499,000. The Porsche 718 Cayman Standard (2017) has no price in the data, so the Mustang is the known affordable option.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Mustang Mach‑E produces 394 PS and 676 Nm, both higher than the Porsche 718 Cayman’s 300 PS and 380 Nm. The Mach‑E also has all‑wheel drive for better traction.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Mustang Mach‑E is better for daily commuting due to its SUV body, five seats, automatic transmission, and electric motor for low running costs. The Porsche Cayman is a two‑door sports car with limited practicality.
Which is more fuel efficient?
The Ford Mustang Mach‑E is electric, so it uses no gasoline and has lower energy costs per kilometer. The Porsche 718 Cayman runs on gasoline and has a turbocharged 1,988cc engine, but exact fuel consumption figures are not provided.