Toyota 86 2.0 A/T (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 2.0 A/T (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 2.0 A/T (2017) Toyota ₱1,990,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400 � 6600 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Segment | S | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4240 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1775 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1320 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1285 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17 Alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 17 Alloy | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/40 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota 86 2.0 A/T (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing performance versus practicality, the Toyota 86 2.0 A/T is the clear choice if you prioritize sporty driving and a compact coupe layout. Priced at ₱1,990,000, it offers 200 PS at 7,000 rpm and 205 Nm of torque, delivering a sharp performance in a lightweight RWD chassis with a 6‑speed automatic. Its two‑door, 2+2 seating and coupe body make it ideal for enthusiasts who value handling over space. In contrast, the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT is priced slightly lower at ₱1,845,000 but trades performance for utility: it runs a 3.0‑liter diesel engine that produces 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, suitable for heavier loads. With a 4‑door SUV body, it seats up to five and offers a longer length (4,825 mm) and wider width (1,860 mm), making it more practical for families or cargo. The mu‑X’s turbo‑intercooler diesel also provides better torque at lower rpm, which is advantageous for daily commuting or light off‑road use. Ultimately, choose the Toyota 86 if you want a sporty driving experience and can accommodate its limited seating; pick the Isuzu mu‑X if you need a more spacious, torque‑rich vehicle for everyday utility.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Toyota 86 2.0 A/T at ₱1,990,000.
Which vehicle offers more power?
The Toyota 86 delivers higher peak power with 200 PS at 7,000 rpm versus the Isuzu mu‑X’s 177 PS at 3,550–3,650 rpm.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
For daily commuting, the Isuzu mu‑X provides more torque (380 Nm) at lower rpm and a larger 4‑door SUV body, making it more practical for families or cargo.
Which vehicle has better practicality?
The Isuzu mu‑X is more practical with 4 doors, seating for five, and a larger body size (4,825 mm length, 1,860 mm width), while the Toyota 86 is a two‑door coupe with 2+2 seating.